Skill UI

A detailed guide for modeling the complete academic peer-review lifecycle, specifically tailored to the ECCV conference structure. It covers the timeline from submission through rebuttal and AC discussion to final decision, detailing critical points such as co-author enforcement regimes, LLM policy adherence, panel reviewer composition, and strategic points influencing the final outcome. Essential for researchers targeting top-tier vision conferences.

A comprehensive guide for computer vision researchers to determine if their project is a good fit for ECCV, considering scope, technical durability, and academic timing. It weighs the project's contribution against the specific requirements of ECCV versus competing top-tier venues like CVPR and ICCV, ensuring strategic submission planning.

This guide outlines the complete project management workflow for major computer vision conferences like ECCV, CVPR, and ICCV. It covers the entire academic cycle, from initial registration and submission through peer review, acceptance, camera-readiness, and post-conference retargeting strategies. Useful for research teams planning multiple submissions across even and odd years.

A comprehensive guide for structuring the introduction and related-work section of academic manuscripts, specifically tailored for journals like The Economic Journal (EJ). It teaches authors how to effectively position their research contribution for a broad, generalist economic readership, moving beyond niche citations to articulate the general economic question, the gap in knowledge, and the paper's wide-ranging relevance.

This comprehensive guide structures the process for authors responding to reviewers' reports (R&R) from top-tier academic journals. It provides a step-by-step plan for drafting the response letter, ensuring a respectful, evidence-based tone, and systematically addressing all major concerns regarding economic mechanism, identification, and broad relevance. It emphasizes strategic negotiation and structural rigor.

This tool helps authors conduct a pre-mortem review before submitting manuscripts to demanding general-interest journals. It guides the identification and pre-emption of likely objections—such as lack of broad interest, missing economic mechanism, or identification threats—allowing authors to proactively harden their argument, structure their contribution, and greatly increase the paper's chances of acceptance.

This tool serves as a comprehensive workflow router for authors submitting manuscripts to The Economic Journal (EJ). It does not write content but guides users through the entire academic publishing lifecycle. By identifying the current bottleneck—whether it's broadening the topic, strengthening causal claims, improving robustness, or polishing the writing style—it accurately directs the user to the next specialized skill needed, ensuring the final work meets the journal's standards of broad relevance and technical rigor.

This skill guides authors on determining the suitability of their ecology manuscript for *Ecology Letters*. It assesses conceptual ambition, methodological rigor, scope fit (e.g., macroecology, theory-data integration), and adherence to the journal's unique short-form structure and high standards. Use it before submission to ensure the paper meets the journal's requirement for a single, clear, general principle.

A specialized guide for papers targeting top-tier econometric theory journals. This skill helps authors determine if their work's core contribution is a rigorous, non-trivial theoretical theorem (focusing on asymptotics, limit theory, or mathematical foundations) rather than an empirical application. It outlines the required mathematical rigor, structure, and scope necessary for acceptance in theory-heavy venues.

This guide serves as a comprehensive fit check for manuscripts targeting the journal Economic Policy. It outlines the journal's unique positioning as a leading European policy-oriented venue, emphasizing rigorous yet accessible analysis. It provides detailed guidance on the Panel presentation route, scope limitations (European/international policy questions), required methodological depth, and house style conventions, ensuring the paper is policy-relevant rather than merely theoretical.

This skill guides researchers on how to position an economic policy manuscript's contribution against two critical frontiers: the existing academic literature and the current, live policy debate (e.g., central bank statements, commission proposals). It teaches authors to synthesize a single contribution sentence that moves both the academic and the policy conversation, ensuring the paper is timely, impactful, and highly relevant to policymakers.

This guide outlines the specialized strategy for revising academic papers following a panel discussion at Economic Policy (EP). Since the discussants' comments are published alongside the final paper, the rebuttal must be fully integrated into the revised text. It teaches systematic triage—deciding whether to fix, concede, or defend every critique—to maintain academic rigor and policy coherence.