Skill UI

This guide helps researchers determine if their applied microeconomics work meets the rigorous standards of the American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied). It serves as a pre-submission checklist, detailing the required depth of causal identification (e.g., RCTs, DiD, IV), methodological robustness, expected manuscript structure, and avoiding common desk-reject pitfalls. Essential for high-quality academic writing.

This guide provides a rigorous framework for defending causal identification claims in empirical microeconomics, tailored for top-tier journals like AEJ: Applied. It covers modern techniques and anti-patterns for RCTs, Difference-in-Differences (DiD), Regression Discontinuity (RDD), and Instrumental Variables (IV), ensuring the mapping from variation to the causal estimand is explicit, defensible, and falsifiable.

This guide provides stringent methodological standards for establishing credible causal claims in empirical policy manuscripts. It covers advanced econometric techniques—including Difference-in-Differences (DiD), Instrumental Variables (IV), Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD), and Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT)—required to move beyond mere correlation and prove that the observed effect is genuinely caused by the policy intervention.

This skill guides authors through evaluating the suitability of their clinical research manuscript for Annals of Internal Medicine. It provides deep insights into the journal's high standards, including specific methodological requirements (CONSORT, PRISMA, STROBE, STARD, TRIPOD), required evidence synthesis depth, ideal scope (RCTs, systematic reviews, guidelines), and current house style guidelines necessary for successful submission.

This skill guides authors on assessing if their cardiovascular manuscript meets the rigorous standards of Circulation, the AHA's flagship journal. It covers the journal's specific scope, ideal research methods (e.g., RCTs, biomarker studies, epidemiology), structural requirements, and how to effectively frame the work to impact AHA guidelines and clinical practice.

This comprehensive guide helps authors assess the suitability of their diabetes or metabolic manuscript for *Diabetes Care* (ADA). It details the required clinical scope, evidence strength (e.g., RCTs, observational studies), necessary data analysis standards, and specific structural requirements, ensuring the work aligns with high-impact clinical practice guidelines and the ADA Standards of Care.

A comprehensive workflow guide for routing clinical medicine manuscripts. It classifies studies by specialty, study design (RCT, observational, review), and evidence strength, helping authors select the optimal journal venue (e.g., JAMA, Lancet) for submission and re-framing. It emphasizes matching the manuscript to specialized society guidelines and evidence hierarchy.

This comprehensive skill guides authors on assessing the suitability of cardiovascular manuscripts for the European Heart Journal (EHJ). It provides detailed criteria covering journal positioning, required clinical relevance, advanced methodology standards (e.g., RCT and registry design), and structural adherence to ESC guidelines. Use it to reframe your research and ensure your work meets the high academic bar of EHJ.

A comprehensive skill for assessing the fit, framing, and structural requirements for manuscripts targeting Gastroenterology or similar GI/hepatology venues. It analyzes scope, required methodology standards (e.g., for RCTs, microbiome studies), house style, and official submission checklists, ensuring authors meet the high academic bar for publication in digestive and liver sciences.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for authors submitting clinical, translational, or epidemiological oncology studies to JAMA Oncology. It covers venue fit assessment, required methodological rigor (e.g., RCTs, RWE, biomarker validation), mandatory reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA), and adherence to the journal's specific house style and submission checklist. It is a crucial pre-submission aid, ensuring the research addresses a clinically meaningful, decision-relevant question.

This comprehensive guide maps various study designs (e.g., RCT, Observational, Systematic Review) to mandatory reporting checklists and flow diagrams (such as CONSORT, PRISMA, STROBE, STARD). It ensures researchers meet the rigorous, standardized reporting requirements for top-tier medical journal submissions.

A comprehensive guide for authors to select, defend, and strengthen the internal validity of clinical study designs (RCT, Cohort, Diagnostic, etc.). It provides detailed safeguards—covering topics like intention-to-treat analysis, confounding control, blinding, and power calculations—to ensure manuscripts meet the rigorous reporting standards of top-tier medical journals like JAMA.