Skill UI

A guide for authors submitting to top-tier management journals (like JMS). It teaches how to crystallize raw research findings into a single, powerful, one-sentence theoretical contribution claim. This framework ensures the paper clearly defines what theoretical conversation it engages, what prior understanding it revises, and under what scope conditions, moving beyond simple results reporting.

A comprehensive guide for positioning academic contributions within journals like the Journal of Management Studies (JMS). It teaches authors to frame their work not as filling a 'gap,' but as resolving a theoretical 'tension' or advancing a specific theoretical conversation. The guide outlines key contribution archetypes (Extend, Challenge, Reconcile, Bridge) and best practices for making a rigorous, argument-driven case in the literature review.

This guide helps researchers refine initial ideas into publishable, theory-driven research questions suitable for the Journal of Management Studies (JMS). It emphasizes grounding the research in a real-world organizational phenomenon and ensuring the question moves a defined theoretical conversation, rather than just filling a literature gap.

This guide instructs authors on how to elevate empirical findings from mere data points into rigorous theoretical contributions. It teaches the method of identifying the core academic 'conversation,' specifying theoretical gaps, and framing the research as a distinct 'move' that advances or challenges existing theories. Essential for improving scholarly impact and writing high-level academic papers.

This guide helps researchers structure the Policy Contribution Statement required by journals like JPP&M. It teaches how to transform solid research findings and data estimates into actionable, evidence-based policy recommendations. Focus areas include defining the policy conversation, identifying specific regulated actors, ensuring recommendations are within the actor's authority, and strictly linking claims to the empirical evidence provided.

This guide helps authors craft sophisticated introductions by positioning their research within an existing academic conversation. It teaches how to move beyond merely identifying a 'gap' to actively 'problematizing' the field by challenging core assumptions, and how to explicitly demonstrate the cross-departmental relevance of findings to maximize impact with journal editors and reviewers.

This guide helps authors structure their academic manuscripts for top-tier Information Systems journals (e.g., MISQ). It emphasizes moving beyond simple gap-spotting by requiring authors to explicitly join an established IS conversation, keep the IT artifact central to the theory, and clearly differentiate the contribution from parent disciplines and adjacent venues.

This guide instructs authors on how to strategically position their research manuscript within the established body of Operations Management (OM) literature. Instead of claiming an unstudied 'void,' the focus is on joining and advancing specific 'operational conversations' within canonical OM streams (e.g., queueing, supply chain, revenue management). It emphasizes differentiating contributions based on novel operational mechanisms or decision levers, ensuring the paper's fit is clear to expert reviewers and editors.

A comprehensive guide detailing the high standards required for presenting security evidence at major conferences. It covers methodologies for proving claims—including attacks, defenses, and detection systems—across live internet measurements, controlled testbeds, and emulation. Key requirements include adaptive adversary modeling, rigorous measurement hygiene, and adherence to ethical review protocols to ensure results are reproducible and relevant to real-world networks.

A comprehensive guide for security researchers to determine the optimal top-tier conference venue for their paper. It provides structured 'fit tests'—including the wire test, deployment envelope test, and adversary ownership test—and a routing table to assess whether the work belongs at NDSS, IEEE S&P, USENIX Security, or related venues, maximizing the chance of successful publication.

A rigorous guide for drafting academic papers for top-tier security conferences like NDSS. It teaches authors how to structure complex security arguments, define capability-bounded adversaries, quantify claims with evidence, weave ethical considerations into the narrative, and adhere to strict page limits to maximize acceptance chances.

This plugin integrates the OpenViking context database, providing powerful long-term memory, session archiving, and semantic recall for OpenClaw agents. It enables agents to query, debug, and manage persistent knowledge bases, significantly enhancing conversational depth and complex tool usage.