Skill UI

A comprehensive pre-deadline audit checklist for submitting papers to the MLSys conference. It guides authors through track-specific requirements (Research vs. Industrial), formatting compliance (10-page limit, two-column layout), maintaining double-blind anonymity, and correctly handling appendices and citations to ensure readiness before the submission deadline.

This comprehensive guide provides a mandatory audit checklist for authors preparing papers for the MobiSys conference. It ensures adherence to strict academic publishing rules, covering essential steps like paper registration, maintaining double-blind anonymity, adhering to the 12-page limit, and avoiding common risks such as identity leaks or dual submissions. Use this to verify submission readiness before the final deadline.

A comprehensive, step-by-step checklist designed for authors preparing manuscripts for submission to Manufacturing & Service Operations Management (M&SOM). It covers crucial elements including double-anonymous anonymization, strict formatting rules (32-page cap, structured abstract), proper departmental routing, and data/code disclosure requirements, ensuring readiness for the scholarOne portal submission.

A comprehensive audit tool designed to ensure academic paper compliance before submitting to major AI conferences like NeurIPS. It systematically checks adherence to the CFP, double-blind anonymity across all assets (PDF, code, data, supplement), correct track selection, and avoids common desk-rejection pitfalls, ensuring the submission is ready for OpenReview.

A comprehensive pre-submission checklist for Operations Research (OR) manuscripts targeting INFORMS/ScholarOne. This guide verifies critical requirements including soft double-anonymous anonymization, contribution statement formatting, page limits, correct area routing, and code/data deposit readiness, ensuring the manuscript meets all standards before final submission.

A comprehensive guide and fit test designed to help researchers assess whether their empirical psychology project meets the high standards of top-tier journals like Psychological Science. It evaluates key criteria including broad impact, statistical robustness, open science readiness (preregistration/data sharing), and adherence to strict format limits. Use this skill to pressure-test your idea before committing resources to data collection or analysis, guiding you toward the optimal manuscript type (e.g., Research Article vs. Registered Report).

This comprehensive guide acts as a router for writing a theoretical or formal-model manuscript for a Psychological Review submission. It guides the user through the entire lifecycle, from initial topic selection and theory construction to argument development, boundary setting, and final submission readiness. It does not replace specialized skills but directs the user to the correct subsequent step.

This auxiliary skill helps researchers assess the suitability of their academic manuscripts in economics, social science, or management for submission to high-level journals like 'Reform of Economic System'. It provides comprehensive guidance on journal positioning, required theoretical depth, appropriate methodology, structural requirements, and common pitfalls, helping authors significantly improve their submission readiness and increase acceptance chances.

This guide helps authors set accurate expectations for academic paper submissions, particularly within fast-paced, first-round decision venues like RAST. It details the double-blind review process, how to interpret terse decisions, and guides strategic decisions regarding paper readiness, conference vs. regular track selection, and comparing different sibling journals.

A comprehensive checklist for preparing academic manuscripts for submission to major financial journals. It guides authors through formatting rules, ensuring double-blind anonymization, preparing the Internet Appendix, writing a detailed cover letter, and addressing mandatory code release conditions, ensuring readiness before final portal submission.

A critical pre-submission tool that provides a comprehensive go/no-go scorecard for academic manuscripts. It evaluates nine dimensions—including fit, robustness, and venue mechanics—to catch avoidable desk-reject risks before the author submits the paper. It scores the manuscript against the target venue's specific requirements and provides actionable feedback on gaps and necessary revisions.

Routes an academic manuscript across venues: from journal selection through execution, submission readiness, simulated review, rebuttal, and replication package. Complements per-journal depth packs with a step-by-step sequencing toolkit.