Skill UI

Workflow to parse external paper reviews, atomize reviewer concerns, and draft a grounded, venue-compliant text rebuttal under strict limits. Supports multiple reviewers, follow-up rounds, and safety checks to avoid fabrication and overpromising. Use when the user needs to reply to reviewers or run an ICML/OpenReview rebuttal.

Perform a two-thread adversarial review: a fresh reviewer writes a strong 200-word rejection memo, then another fresh reviewer defends the paper point-by-point and classifies unresolved issues. Use it before theory paper submission or rebuttal preparation to surface the most damaging possible reviewer attack.

A comprehensive guide detailing the process of responding to major or minor revisions from academic journals (like AAAG). It teaches authors how to structure a point-by-point rebuttal letter, address editor and referee concerns methodically, strengthen the core academic argument, and incorporate required methodological and cartographic fixes, ensuring the response is both respectful and scientifically rigorous.

This guide provides a strategic framework for drafting highly effective and concise author rebuttals for major AI conferences like AAAI. Given strict character limits, no URLs, and no new results, it teaches authors how to triage reviewer feedback, focus on decision-critical factual errors, and maximize impact to improve paper acceptance chances.

A comprehensive guide detailing the multi-phase review structure of the AAAI conference. It advises authors on navigating the two-phase review process, mitigating Phase 1 rejection risks, structuring effective rebuttals, and understanding decision mapping across pre-submission, discussion, and final decision stages.

This guide provides a comprehensive project management framework for submitting research to the AAAI conference. It maps out every critical milestone, from initial topic selection and abstract submission, through the two-phase peer review, writing the rebuttal, and preparing the final camera-ready version and public artifacts. It emphasizes backward planning from hard deadlines and maintaining evidence integrity throughout the rigorous academic lifecycle.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing rebuttals following AAMAS preliminary reviews. It details the specific constraints (e.g., double-blind, no new results), the strategies for addressing diverse technical reviewers (such as game theorists, MARL experts, and systems engineers), and the structured pattern required to maximize the impact of a short response window.

A comprehensive guide for authors transitioning an accepted, anonymous conference submission into the final, public camera-ready version for publication. It covers de-anonymization steps, including restoring author details, updating proceedings metadata, reflowing figures for multiagent papers, and integrating rebuttal promises without expanding the core contribution. This ensures adherence to strict publishing standards.

This guide provides a detailed walkthrough of the AAMAS peer review process. It covers everything from initial submissions and technical evaluation (correctness, significance, rigor) to the rebuttal phase, area-chair synthesis, and final decisions. Use this when planning academic submissions or understanding the rigorous criteria for publishing multi-agent systems research.

A comprehensive project management guide for submitting academic papers to the AAMAS conference. It details all critical milestones, including venue fit, evidence locking, abstract submission, double-blind review, rebuttal, and final camera-ready preparation. Essential for managing complex research involving game theory and multi-agent systems.

Provides a comprehensive guide for authors responding to peer reviewer feedback and revision comments for top-tier academic journals. It teaches structured rebuttal writing, handling disagreements while maintaining professionalism, and managing multi-round revisions to systematically increase publication probability.

A comprehensive guide for drafting professional and strategic rebuttals for major academic conferences, such as ACM Multimedia. Learn how to triage reviewer comments, structure arguments for the Area Chair, address factual errors, and incorporate small, confirmatory results while maintaining anonymity and adhering to strict policy guardrails.