Skill UI

This guide assists researchers in compiling and documenting all necessary ethical approvals, biosafety statements, and data/code availability declarations required for high-impact scientific manuscripts (e.g., Cancer Cell). It ensures compliance with guidelines covering animal protocols (IACUC), human subject ethics (IRB/Consent), and data sharing standards (GEO, Zenodo).

A comprehensive checklist and audit guide for submitting papers to ACM CCS. This resource covers mandatory requirements such as abstract registration deadlines, adherence to the strict two-column sigconf template, rigorous anonymization protocols, dedicated ethics sections, and avoiding desk-reject triggers. Essential for authors preparing for top-tier security conferences.

A comprehensive project management skill designed for guiding the entire lifecycle of an ACM CCS conference submission. It maps out critical milestones, including abstract registration, full-paper upload, rebuttal periods, notification, and artifact evaluation. Users can utilize the backward-planning templates and 'big-four' deadline hopping strategies to manage complex academic deadlines effectively.

This guide details the rigorous requirements for achieving research reproducibility in academic publishing. It moves beyond simple data sharing, mandating that authors deposit model-fitting code, analysis scripts, and materials with persistent identifiers (DOI). Key steps include ensuring reported results can regenerate in a fresh session, completing declarations of competing interests, and linking pre-registrations, ensuring compliance with strict journal standards.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing manuscripts for journals requiring high standards of openness and rigor. It details how to prepare required materials, including data-availability statements, open data/materials deposits, pre-registration plans, and handling restricted data paths, ensuring submitted research is fully reproducible and verifiable.

This comprehensive audit guide assists researchers in preparing papers for CoNEXT submission. It covers critical workflow stages, including choosing the correct submission cycle (December or June), adhering to ACM acmart formatting and strict page budgets, managing the two-step registration process, ensuring double-anonymous review compliance, and implementing essential security checks to prevent identity leaks in artifacts and metadata.

This guide provides a comprehensive, backward planning workflow for preparing and submitting a technical paper to the CoNEXT conference. It outlines the distinct December and June submission cycles, covering essential milestones such as artifact preparation, mandatory registration, major revisions, and the final camera-ready stages, ensuring authors track every step from initial concept to final publication.

A comprehensive guide for researchers in Developmental Psychology on meeting rigorous Open Science standards. It details best practices for data and materials sharing using Persistent Identifiers (DOIs), mandatory preregistration of hypotheses, sample-size justification, and adhering to ethical requirements when working with minors and vulnerable populations. It ensures compliance and reproducibility in modern scientific reporting.

This guide outlines the complete project management workflow for major computer vision conferences like ECCV, CVPR, and ICCV. It covers the entire academic cycle, from initial registration and submission through peer review, acceptance, camera-readiness, and post-conference retargeting strategies. Useful for research teams planning multiple submissions across even and odd years.

A comprehensive pre-upload audit guide specifically designed for submitting papers to the EuroSys conference. It covers critical details including abstract registration gates, strict formatting rules (12 pages, two-column layout), rigorous anonymity standards, and best practices for managing the HotCRP submission process, ensuring compliance before review.

This guide helps researchers structure their economic questions for top experimental economics journals. It emphasizes framing the contribution around a novel, clean experimental design (the 'minimal pair') and the treatment effect, rather than merely the topic itself. It guides authors on decision-making regarding experimental types, pre-registration, and selecting the appropriate academic venue.

This tool guides authors through the rigorous standards required for publishing in top experimental economics journals. It serves as a comprehensive checklist, evaluating a manuscript's fit, methodological strength, design transparency, and structural requirements (e.g., pre-registration, incentive-compatibility) against best practices in behavioral and experimental economics.