Skill UI

A guide for researchers submitting to conferences like ACM Multimedia, detailing how to achieve robust result reproducibility. It covers the necessary steps—including logging code commits, data versions, media preprocessing parameters, and hardware details—to allow independent reviewers to successfully rebuild the reported findings and achieve official reproducibility badges.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing empirical research manuscripts (especially in accounting). It details best practices for structuring main tables (keeping them lean), transforming statistical coefficients into interpretable economic magnitudes, and properly visualizing dynamic effects using event study graphs. It emphasizes moving beyond simple significance stars to provide deep academic context.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting materials science and physical metallurgy manuscripts to Acta Materialia. It emphasizes the necessity of establishing a clear processing–structure–property mechanism, requiring rigorous, quantitative characterization (e.g., TEM, XRD) and detailed mechanistic explanations over simple reports of improved performance. Use this tool for fit assessment and manuscript re-framing.

A powerful skill designed to analyze raw ad campaign performance data from platforms like Google, Meta, and LinkedIn. It goes beyond simple metrics reporting, providing deep diagnosis by identifying underperforming ads, pinpointing budget waste, and calculating the true Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC). It generates concrete, actionable recommendations for what to cut, scale, or test next, optimizing your ad spend and maximizing ROAS.

This comprehensive guide provides rigorous standards for advanced materials manuscripts. It mandates that structure–property claims must be validated through multiple, complementary characterization techniques (triangulation). It also details best practices for benchmarking against the state-of-the-art, ensuring reproducibility, and correctly partitioning core information between the main text and supplementary materials.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to reviewer reports and editor decisions (major/minor revision, rejection). It details how to structure a point-by-point rebuttal letter, what new data (e.g., stability, benchmarking) must be added, and how to ensure the revised manuscript maintains a clear scientific advance while adhering to publication guidelines.

A comprehensive framework designed to rigorously test the stability of key macroeconomic findings. This program addresses potential biases arising from specification choices, sample periods (e.g., Great Moderation, ZLB, COVID breaks), and methodological variations (SVAR vs. LP). It ensures that the reported headline quantity remains robust even when challenged by a skeptical academic referee, providing a targeted defense rather than simply listing extra tables. Ideal for high-stakes empirical macro papers.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for structuring theoretical economics manuscripts for submission to AEJ: Micro. It enforces the theory-first approach, ensuring the introduction immediately presents the economic question and states the main result in words, thus maximizing impact for a broad micro audience. It also covers specific AEA house style conventions, such as reporting standard errors and structuring the abstract.

This guide outlines how to structure a rigorous robustness program for economic policy manuscripts. It emphasizes defending the overall policy takeaway, rather than merely reporting coefficient significance. Users learn to address common econometric threats—such as specification changes, pre-trends, multiple testing, and selection on unobservables—using advanced techniques (e.g., Wild-cluster bootstrap, Oster bounds) to ensure the policy conclusion is stable and credible.

This skill guides authors on condensing complex empirical research findings (tables and figures) to meet the strict formatting constraints of top academic journals like AER: Insights. It enforces a maximum of five one-page exhibits, teaches authors how to select the headline result, central diagnostics, and mechanism, and ensures adherence to specific house styles, such as reporting standard errors instead of significance asterisks, while managing word count budgets.

A comprehensive guide for reporting rigorous educational and social science analyses, adhering to high standards of warrant and transparency (AERA). It covers advanced quantitative methods (HLM, IRT, quasi-experimental), qualitative coding, and mixed-methods integration, ensuring results are reproducible and evidence-based for publication.

This skill provides a rigorous framework for defending the methodology of advanced educational research manuscripts, suitable for top-tier academic journals. It guides users through defining research structure across quantitative (e.g., multilevel, quasi-experimental), qualitative (e.g., ethnography, case study), and mixed methods paradigms. Focus areas include addressing rival explanations, ensuring measurement validity, establishing causal claims, and meeting stringent reporting standards (AERA).