Skill UI

This comprehensive workflow guides users through the end-to-end process of utilizing cloud-based GPU computing resources on Vast.ai. It covers searching for ideal GPU offers based on specs and price, provisioning an instance, running complex training or inference jobs via SSH, collecting model artifacts, and crucially, destroying the instance to prevent unexpected billing. Ideal for deep learning training and research.

This skill analyzes accumulated usage logs (execution traces) from the ARIS research harness. It proposes structural and behavioral optimizations for the workflow itself, including adjusting default parameters, refining skill prompts, and optimizing component ordering. It focuses on improving the system's robustness and efficiency (the 'harness'), rather than altering the research artifacts or code.

This advanced skill automates the entire lifecycle of cloud infrastructure deployment. Instead of manual documentation review, it researches current best practices across multi-cloud platforms (AWS, GCP, Azure), synthesizes a coherent deployment strategy, and generates production-grade Infrastructure as Code (IaC). It outputs comprehensive artifacts, including Terraform modules, Kubernetes manifests, CI/CD pipelines, monitoring setups, and cost estimates, ensuring secure and optimized deployment.

This tool functions as a post-task epilogue, designed to audit and record the entire research journey. It scans the conversation history at the end of a coding or research session to extract critical research artifacts, including decisions, experiments, dead ends, claims, heuristics, and major pivots. It systematically writes this provenance data into the structured `ara/` directory, ensuring a faithful and auditable trace of how the project truly evolved.

This tool performs a rigorous Level 2 semantic epistemic review of Agent-Native Research Artifacts (ARAs). It assesses six critical dimensions—including evidence relevance, falsifiability, and methodological rigor—to determine the content's intellectual soundness. It is used after initial structural validation to provide objective, constructive criticism, scoring the work from Strong Accept to Reject.