Skill UI

This guide details the rigorous, multi-phase artifact evaluation process for research papers submitted to OOPSLA. It covers best practices for creating robust, reproducible, and reusable software artifacts, aiming to achieve Functional, Reusable, and Available badges. Learn how to structure your repository, map claims explicitly, and pass the 'kick-the-tires' dry run, treating every evaluator as a hostile fresh VM.

This comprehensive guide assists reviewers and authors in determining the most appropriate venue for programming language research within the SIGPLAN community. It provides a detailed 'center-of-mass' test, helping categorize contributions based on whether they emphasize metatheory (POPL), performance engineering (PLDI), functional techniques (ICFCP), or the broad design scope characteristic of OOPSLA. It guides the decision-making process for academic submissions.

This skill guides authors submitting work related to Operations Research (OR). It helps assess whether a manuscript provides a genuine theoretical or methodological advance in fields like optimization, stochastic processes, queueing theory, and mathematical modeling. It emphasizes the necessity of rigorous proofs, mathematical depth, and positioning the contribution against existing OR literature, rather than merely presenting a case study application.

This skill guides researchers in developing theory-driven research questions specifically tailored for submission to top academic journals, particularly Organization Science. It assesses whether a research idea genuinely focuses on organizational processes, identifies the relevant theoretical conversation, and evaluates the suitability of the chosen academic venue against competitors (e.g., ASQ, AMJ). It ensures the question has a clear contribution source and appropriate level of analysis.

This router guides researchers through the entire lifecycle of an Organization Science manuscript, from initial topic selection and theory development to data analysis, contribution framing, and final submission. It does not replace specialized skills but provides a structured roadmap, helping users determine the correct next step and maintain coherence throughout the complex academic writing process.

A comprehensive guide for selecting and justifying research designs in Organization Studies. It covers rigorous standards for both qualitative (ethnographic, process, historical) and quantitative approaches. The core principle emphasized is that the design must directly illuminate the underlying organizational mechanism or process, not just measure endpoints.

This guide helps researchers evaluate whether a raw phenomenon or empirical question meets the high theoretical standards required by top-tier academic journals like Organization Studies (OS). It diagnoses whether a topic is theoretically generative, processual, and engages with social theory, guiding the user to refine the focus from mere description to a core theoretical contribution.

A comprehensive guide to the Operations Research (OR) academic publishing review process. This guide explains the departmental editorial routing, the soft double-anonymous review model, and how to interpret complex decision letters (Reject, Major/Minor Revision, Accept). It details the roles of Area and Associate Editors, and provides actionable strategies for authors to strengthen their technical contributions and respond effectively to reviewer feedback.

A comprehensive guide detailing the necessary author response techniques for high-stakes academic conferences, particularly focusing on the shift from traditional rebuttals to structured, mandated revision cycles (shepherding). It covers pre-submission pre-mortems, managing mandated changes using a change matrix, and maintaining professional rigor throughout the review process. Ideal for PhD students and researchers.

A comprehensive guide detailing the rigorous peer-review pipeline of top academic conferences (like OSDI). It covers multi-round double-blind review, strategies for conditional acceptance, heavy shepherding, and optimizing your paper's structure to survive early triage rounds. Essential reading for researchers aiming to publish high-impact, publishable work.

This skill automates the complex process of transforming raw research papers (PDF or URL) into structured, knowledge graph-ready resources for OpenViking. It executes a rigorous workflow: reading the entire paper, compiling an ARA-style artifact directory, validating the content against established schemas, and finally ingesting the structured data into the OpenViking knowledge base using the `ov add-resource` command. It ensures all evidence, claims, and logical relationships are captured systematically.

This guide details the rigorous, post-acceptance process for preparing a research paper for IEEE Xplore publication. It covers crucial technical steps beyond simple formatting, including complete de-anonymization, adhering to the IEEEtran template, finalizing metadata (ORCID, index terms), passing PDF eXpress compliance, securing eCopyright, and properly linking open data repositories with DOIs.