Skill UI

A critical framework for evaluating art-historical projects, designed to elevate a local description or catalog entry into a significant, general disciplinary contribution. Use this guide to pressure-test the scope, argument strength, visual feasibility, and overall scholarly reach of your research before committing to deep writing.

A detailed guide for authors writing the Related Work section of an Automated Software Engineering (ASE) paper. It teaches the crucial 'delta argument' methodology, emphasizing that positioning must be against prior automated tools, covering multiple SE literature lanes, and conducting fair, head-to-head empirical comparisons to clearly delineate the novelty of the proposed work.

This tool acts as a diagnostic router for writing manuscripts intended for the Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ). It does not write the content but guides the user through the entire research and publication cycle—from initial topic selection and theory development, through methodology, data analysis, and final submission/rebuttal. It diagnoses bottlenecks and suggests the next specialized skill to focus on.

A comprehensive guide for authors writing related work sections for top-tier systems conferences (e.g., ATC). It teaches how to accurately position a new system relative to existing literature, emphasizing delta-first comparisons, covering adjacent subareas, and adhering to strict double-blind citation protocols. Essential for academic rigor in systems research.

A comprehensive guide detailing the end-to-end workflow for submitting research papers to top-tier academic conferences, such as the ACM SIGOPS ATC. It provides a backward planning structure, covering critical stages from initial system freezing and extended abstract writing, through multi-round peer review, rebuttal preparation, artifact evaluation, and final camera-ready submission.

This skill serves as an expert academic advisor for researchers targeting high-level journals, specifically focusing on the 'Auditing Research' journal. It assesses the suitability of a manuscript (covering auditing, accounting, or corporate governance) against the journal's specific positioning, required structure, common pitfalls, and theoretical depth. It helps authors optimize their writing, improve academic rigor, and determine the best publication venue.

This tool serves as the central workflow router for manuscripts targeting the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS). It guides the user through the entire academic writing and submission lifecycle, from initial topic selection and literature positioning to rigorous data analysis, writing style refinement, and final submission/rebuttal. It diagnoses the appropriate format (Article, Letter, Comment) and the next required skill stage, ensuring the research meets the journal's requirement for broad, general interest in political science.

This skill acts as a comprehensive router for the entire manuscript lifecycle directed towards publishing in Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR). It does not generate content but guides the user through the necessary steps, from initial topic selection and theory development to data analysis, contribution framing, and final rebuttal preparation. Use it when you are unsure of the next optimal step or are bouncing between different stages of writing.

This skill guides the polishing and structural refinement of academic accounting manuscripts, specifically for Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) journal submissions. It ensures the abstract is concise (≤300 words) and comprehensive, enforces front-loading of the research question and findings, and mandates strict consistency checks between constructs, proxies, and variables. It also ensures adherence to specific academic formatting rules, such as footnotes and author-date referencing.

A comprehensive guide to meeting the rigorous reporting standards required for high-impact scientific journals (e.g., Cell Press). It details the structure of STAR Methods, mandates the creation of a Key Resources Table (KRT), and outlines necessary authentication for cell lines, antibodies, animal models, and deposited data (including specific identifiers like RRIDs, GEO/PRIDE accessions). This ensures maximum transparency and reproducibility in scientific research writing.

This sophisticated tool is designed to polish scientific manuscripts for high-impact, rigorous journals. It guides users in structuring a mechanistic narrative, ensuring that every claim made in the text is precisely calibrated to the strength of the supporting experimental evidence (e.g., distinguishing correlation from necessity). It focuses on scientific storytelling, nomenclature consistency, and eliminating hype, transforming raw research data into a polished, scholarly article.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to top-tier security conferences like CCS. It provides rigorous rules on establishing explicit threat models, quantifying security claims with measurable evidence, structuring the core technical argument, and effectively compressing complex research into limited page limits. Essential for academic publication in the field of cybersecurity.