Skill UI

This guide defines the role and responsibilities of a Senior Quality Manager Responsible Person (QMR) for highly regulated MedTech and HealthTech environments. It covers essential functions under ISO 13485, including leading management reviews, establishing quality objectives, monitoring performance KPIs, and maintaining strict regulatory compliance oversight. Use this resource when developing a Quality Management System (QMS) or managing regulatory accountability.

A comprehensive guide for building applications with Claude, ensuring responsible data handling. This skill covers critical patterns such as PII redaction (stripping sensitive data like emails, phone numbers, and card numbers), optimizing the 200K token context window through conversation trimming, and implementing best practices for data retention and privacy compliance when interacting with the Anthropic API.

Aria functions as a System Architect, responsible for establishing the definitive structural foundation of the entire system. She designs comprehensive blueprints covering the data model (schema, relationships, constraints), API contract specifications (endpoints, auth, pagination), modular file structure, and selection of core architectural design patterns. Her output ensures that no code is written without a rigorously defined, approved architectural plan, minimizing ambiguity and technical debt.

Conducts a comprehensive, structured ethical review for any AI or ML model, feature, or product. It assesses risks related to fairness, bias, transparency, privacy, and societal impact, providing a risk tier score, necessary mitigations, and governance documentation suitable for pre-deployment compliance.

This comprehensive canvas guides teams through developing robust AI-powered features. It ensures product decisions are rigorous by covering problem definition, model selection (LLM, RAG, etc.), data governance, evaluation metrics, user experience design (including fallbacks), and responsible AI compliance. Ideal for assessing AI readiness and preventing common product failures.

A comprehensive guide for packaging and submitting evidence packages (artifacts) for NLP research papers, such as code, datasets, prompts, and model outputs. It details requirements for reproducibility, adhering to the Responsible NLP checklist, ensuring proper anonymization, and preparing for post-acceptance public release in academic settings like ACL.

A comprehensive guide detailing the standards required for academic reproducibility in NLP and LLM research. It covers the 'Responsible NLP checklist' requirements, including detailed reporting for hyperparameters, model versions, exact prompts, decoding parameters, data contamination auditing, and variance reporting to ensure claims are auditable and robust.

A comprehensive audit checklist for authors submitting papers to major NLP conferences (like ACL) via OpenReview. This guide covers mandatory formatting rules, maintaining anonymity, addressing ethical declarations (Responsible NLP), managing resubmission links, and ensuring adherence to the entire submission workflow to prevent desk rejection.

A specialized guide for authors targeting the ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT). It helps authors strategically frame their responsible AI research, ensuring claims are rigorously grounded in both technical measurement and social context. Covers necessary evidence bars, scope calibration, and submission best practices for this niche venue.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for researchers packaging and releasing artifacts (data, code, instruments) derived from real communities in CSCW research. It emphasizes ethical constraints, de-identification techniques (such as quote search and join attacks), and best practices for protecting studied communities' privacy, ensuring responsible sharing.

A comprehensive guide for preparing research artifacts (code, data, prompts, models) for EACL submissions. It details the two stages: an anonymized supplement for the initial review (ARR) and a fully licensed, public release for post-acceptance. Emphasis is placed on reproducibility, responsible NLP practices, and proper documentation.

This comprehensive checklist is designed for auditing NLP research papers, particularly for major conferences like EACL. It serves as a claims audit, ensuring that every reported result, claim, or finding—including hyperparameters, compute costs, verbatim prompts, data sources, and significance testing—is fully documented and reproducible. It emphasizes academic rigor and transparency in AI research.