Skill UI

Orchestrate a text-only resubmission of a polished paper to a different venue under hard constraints: no new experiments, no bibliography edits, no framework changes. Absorbs prior reviewer feedback while preserving the original submission directory. Ideal for tight time budgets and immutable prior submissions.

Runs a SHA-pinned integrity-forensics sweep on a paper (evidence ledger, auditor proposals, rules-only report), converting verdicts into typed policy gates (BLOCK/WARN/NO_NEW_BLOCKER) and an obligations ledger. Used for pre-submission integrity checks, peer-review forensics and resubmission pipelines.

A comprehensive audit checklist for authors submitting papers to major NLP conferences (like ACL) via OpenReview. This guide covers mandatory formatting rules, maintaining anonymity, addressing ethical declarations (Responsible NLP), managing resubmission links, and ensuring adherence to the entire submission workflow to prevent desk rejection.

Plan an ACL paper across ACL Rolling Review cycles: choose a cycle against conference commitment windows, backward-plan from the ARR deadline, track review, response and meta-review timing, decide commitment, loop resubmissions, and reach camera-ready and ACL Anthology publication.

A comprehensive guide for authors navigating the rigorous multi-stage review process of *Acta Electronica Sinica* (AES). It covers the entire journey from initial submission and double-blind peer review to final acceptance, detailing decision points, interpreting manuscript statuses, understanding critical timelines (e.g., the 6-month red line), and providing strategic advice for revisions and resubmissions in electronics and information science.

A comprehensive guide for authors facing a revise-and-resubmit (R&R) status in academic journals. It outlines the entire revision lifecycle, from building a structured response matrix and performing substantive re-analysis (re-coding, new experiments) to strategically drafting the point-by-point rebuttal letter. Focuses on maintaining academic rigor, reconciling conflicting reviews, and ensuring methodological consistency before final resubmission.

This skill provides expert guidance on evaluating academic manuscripts, particularly those in auditing, accounting, and economics. It helps users determine the suitability of their work for specific, high-level journals (e.g., Auditing and Economics Research). It covers journal positioning, required methodology, structural requirements, common rejection pitfalls, and strategic advice for revision or resubmission.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to high-level academic journals, specifically detailing how to construct a point-by-point rebuttal letter after receiving R&R (Revision & Resubmission) feedback. Covers advanced econometric topics, identifying common reviewer critiques (e.g., parallel trends, robustness checks, endogeneity), and structuring professional, evidence-based revisions.

A comprehensive guide for authors navigating the academic publication lifecycle, covering strategies for rebuttal windows, camera-ready revisions, and resubmission briefs for top-tier conferences. Learn how to structure arguments, maintain anonymity, focus on evidence, and calibrate tone to effectively address reviewer concerns in different submission scenarios.

A comprehensive guide for managing the entire lifecycle of major academic conference submissions (e.g., CVPR). It details critical timelines, from initial scope freezing and paper drafting to supplement submission, rebuttal writing, and resubmission strategies across different venues (ICCV, ECCV). Focuses heavily on project management and coordination to prevent process failures.

A comprehensive guide on structuring responses to peer reviews for top-tier academic conferences (e.g., DAC, ICCAD). It provides strategies for writing rebuttals, transforming reviews into actionable fixes, and adapting the response style for both conference resubmission and journal formats, emphasizing evidence over argument.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to top-tier database conferences (like EDBT). It teaches how to audit the novelty and eligibility of a research paper by writing a 'delta-first' contrast against related work, rather than simply listing citations. Covers positioning contributions relative to flagship venues, theory literature, and managing resubmission rules.