Skill UI

Explains AAAI's two-phase review process, Phase 1 rejection risk, Phase 2 additional reviews, AI-assisted review handling, author feedback, and stage-by-stage planning for submissions.

This guide provides a detailed walkthrough of the AAMAS peer review process. It covers everything from initial submissions and technical evaluation (correctness, significance, rigor) to the rebuttal phase, area-chair synthesis, and final decisions. Use this when planning academic submissions or understanding the rigorous criteria for publishing multi-agent systems research.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for authors submitting papers to Acta Automatica Sinica (AAS). It details how to organize and present anonymous, reproducible code, data, and experimental artifacts to enhance the credibility and rigor of research in control, automation, and pattern recognition, supporting the double-blind review process.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for achieving scientific reproducibility in academic research, particularly for control systems, automation, and pattern recognition. It covers fixing environment dependencies, data handling, random seeds, and process pipelines, helping authors withstand rigorous peer review questioning and build verifiable research artifacts.

A comprehensive guide detailing the double-blind three-review process for academic journals. It breaks down the complete workflow—from initial submission and editor screening to external review, multiple revision rounds, and final acceptance. The guide provides authors with actionable advice on preparing for each stage, managing expectations, and avoiding common procedural pitfalls.

This comprehensive guide structures the entire academic publishing journey for Acta Automatica Sinica (AAS). It breaks down the process from initial topic selection and writing to double-blind review, multi-round revisions, and final publication. It outlines critical milestones, stage gates, and potential pitfalls to help authors manage the complex timeline and ensure a professional, structured submission.

A comprehensive guide to modeling the entire academic review cycle for major NLP conferences like ACL. It details the stages from initial submission (ARR cycle intake) through peer review, author response, meta-review synthesis, commitment decision, and final venue decision (Main Conference, Findings, or Reject). It also outlines the roles of reviewers, area chairs, and program chairs, providing strategic advice for authors on navigating the complex publication landscape.

A guide for researchers submitting to conferences like ACM Multimedia, detailing how to achieve robust result reproducibility. It covers the necessary steps—including logging code commits, data versions, media preprocessing parameters, and hardware details—to allow independent reviewers to successfully rebuild the reported findings and achieve official reproducibility badges.

A comprehensive guide for authors navigating the competitive academic publication landscape, specifically detailing the ACM MM review process. Learn how to strategically identify points of leverage—from thematic area choice to rebuttal crafting—to maximize the influence of your work and improve your acceptance chances.

This comprehensive guide outlines the entire end-to-end workflow for submitting and presenting at ACM Multimedia (ACM MM). It breaks down the complex process into distinct phases—from initial thematic scoping and track selection, through the OpenReview abstract submission, paper and supplement delivery, rebuttal, decision, camera-ready preparation, and final conference presentation. It provides actionable advice, risk mitigation strategies, and re-targeting options for both success and rejection.

This guide outlines the strategic approach for navigating the fast, decisive peer review process of AER: Insights. It details the single-round, conditional accept/reject model, emphasizing that papers must be submission-ready and objection-proofed upfront, as there is no traditional revise-and-resubmit cycle. Learn how to pre-empt major critiques concerning importance, robustness, and design credibility before submission.

This tool acts as a comprehensive router, guiding users through the specific stages of writing a short-format manuscript for American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights). It helps structure the process from initial topic selection and identifying a single core insight, through literature positioning, model refinement, and final submission/rebuttal preparation, ensuring compliance with strict length and scope requirements.