Skill UI

This advanced routing skill guides researchers through the complex process of submitting manuscripts in agriculture, environment, and earth science. It does not replace a single journal profile, but rather classifies the work by sub-field, contribution type, and evidence shape. By evaluating pre-routing gates (e.g., evidence strength, scale match), it determines the best specialist venue for re-framing and submission.

A comprehensive workflow guide for routing clinical medicine manuscripts. It classifies studies by specialty, study design (RCT, observational, review), and evidence strength, helping authors select the optimal journal venue (e.g., JAMA, Lancet) for submission and re-framing. It emphasizes matching the manuscript to specialized society guidelines and evidence hierarchy.

This central routing skill guides authors through the complex process of journal selection for engineering and technology manuscripts. It does not replace a single journal submission but first classifies the content based on the engineering sub-discipline, contribution type (e.g., method, system, device), validation shape (e.g., simulation, field experiment), and intended audience breadth. It then routes the paper to the most specialized and appropriate journal skill for accurate re-framing and submission.

This skill is a comprehensive routing guide for scholarly manuscripts in the humanities. It assists users by classifying submissions based on sub-field (e.g., history, philosophy, literature), contribution type (argument, theory, interpretation), and methodological approach. It helps determine the optimal target journal among various specialized and generalist venues, ensuring the manuscript is correctly framed for scholarly review and fit.

This comprehensive routing skill guides users through the complex process of selecting the most appropriate English-language academic journal for their manuscript. It acts as a high-level meta-guide, moving beyond single-journal profiles. Users classify their work based on its contribution type (e.g., causal effect, new theory), methodological shape (e.g., structural, field experiment), target discipline (e.g., finance, marketing), and ultimate submission goal (e.g., top-5 venue). It provides actionable advice for re-framing and optimizing fit.

This comprehensive routing skill guides researchers in selecting the optimal journal venue for natural-science, clinical, or physical manuscripts. It classifies the work based on discipline, advance type (e.g., mechanism, discovery), evidence shape (e.g., clinical trial, simulation), and audience breadth. It helps optimize the manuscript's fit and submission chances across hundreds of leading scientific journals.

Provides a comprehensive strategy for responding to major journal revisions, especially in Earth and Planetary Science. It guides authors on how to satisfy conflicting technical demands from multiple reviewers by routing detailed evidence to supplements while keeping the main text concise, persuasive, and compliant with strict formatting rules.

This guide helps researchers determine the most appropriate academic venue for their responsible AI work. It provides detailed criteria and rigorous testing methods (like the Delete-the-equity test) to assess whether fairness, accountability, or transparency is a primary, core contribution, guiding authors away from merely 'bolted-on' ethical framing.

A comprehensive guide for researchers deciding the optimal conference venue (e.g., FAST, OSDI, NSDI, ATC) for their storage-related academic work. It advises on distinguishing a core storage contribution from general systems results, detailing specific contribution shapes FAST rewards, and providing routing logic based on the project's nature and evidence maturity.

This guide provides a comprehensive understanding of the Human Relations (HR) journal's two-gate review system. It details the editorial scoping screen, the double-anonymous developmental peer review, and how to accurately interpret various decision types (e.g., Major Revision vs. Reject). It is crucial for authors to calibrate expectations regarding theoretical contribution, process timelines, and strategic decisions about rerouting to sibling journals.

A comprehensive guide for researchers determining if their cross-layer systems work belongs at ASPLOS or a specialized venue (e.g., ISCA, SOSP, PLDI). It introduces the crucial "deletion test," a routing table based on core claims (microarchitecture, language design, etc.), and criteria for identifying genuine cross-disciplinary intersections between OS, PL, and Architecture.

A comprehensive guide to strategically routing robotics research projects. This skill helps determine whether a project is best suited for ICRA, IROS, CoRL, RA-L, or other specialized venues. It evaluates your work based on the physical embodiment test, contribution type (e.g., HRI, manipulation, perception), and provides a decision framework between direct conference submission and journal publication.