Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for security researchers to determine the optimal top-tier conference venue for their paper. It provides structured 'fit tests'—including the wire test, deployment envelope test, and adversary ownership test—and a routing table to assess whether the work belongs at NDSS, IEEE S&P, USENIX Security, or related venues, maximizing the chance of successful publication.

This comprehensive guide assists researchers in determining the appropriate scope and venue for their networked systems research. It details the core requirements for top-tier conferences like NSDI, distinguishing between Research, Operational Systems, and Frontiers tracks. Furthermore, it provides critical routing advice for differentiating contributions between related venues such as OSDI, SIGCOMM, and FAST, ensuring the work aligns with the correct technical focus.

Provides a comprehensive guide to the Organization Science submission and review process. Learn about the decentralized senior-editor model, conflict-of-interest routing, double-blind preparation, and how to interpret complex decision letters (accept, reject, R&R). This resource is essential for authors preparing high-quality manuscripts for this top-tier academic venue.

A comprehensive guide to the Operations Research (OR) academic publishing review process. This guide explains the departmental editorial routing, the soft double-anonymous review model, and how to interpret complex decision letters (Reject, Major/Minor Revision, Accept). It details the roles of Area and Associate Editors, and provides actionable strategies for authors to strengthen their technical contributions and respond effectively to reviewer feedback.

A comprehensive pre-submission checklist for Operations Research (OR) manuscripts targeting INFORMS/ScholarOne. This guide verifies critical requirements including soft double-anonymous anonymization, contribution statement formatting, page limits, correct area routing, and code/data deposit readiness, ensuring the manuscript meets all standards before final submission.

This comprehensive guide helps researchers decide the optimal venue for their ubiquitous computing (Ubicomp) paper. It provides detailed criteria for distinguishing contributions—such as human-centricity, core insight, and system focus—and advises on routing between major conferences (PerCom, MobiCom, SenSys) and journals (UbiComp/IMWUT) based on contribution shape and publication model.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for writing *Progress in Human Geography* manuscripts. It guides authors through the entire writing process by routing the piece based on its lifecycle stage, genre (Review Article vs. Progress Report), and whether the topic is truly review-worthy. It systematically ensures the resulting work is synthetic, critical, and focused on developing a core academic argument.

This guide provides a detailed framework for researchers to determine the most suitable venue (e.g., PLDI, POPL, OOPSLA) for their programming language or systems research paper. It guides authors on whether their core evidence lies in theoretical proofs, working implementations with benchmarks, or empirical usage studies, ensuring optimal submission routing and maximizing acceptance chances.

This comprehensive checklist guides authors through the final, critical steps before submitting a scholarly article to Production and Operations Management (POM). It ensures strict adherence to formatting rules (e.g., 32-page limit, 1.5 spacing), double-blind anonymization, proper departmental routing, and mandatory disclosures (such as same-data usage). Using this preflight check maximizes the likelihood of a smooth and compliant submission process.

An expert orchestrator and routing guide for manuscripts submitted to the Population and Development Review (PDR). It helps users determine the appropriate specialization path, whether they are starting an idea, refining the theory, or finalizing the submission. It matches the content's lifecycle stage and article type (e.g., Research Article, Notes & Commentary) to the correct development pipeline, ensuring the deep connection between population dynamics and societal policy is maintained.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for manuscripts submitted to Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ). It guides authors through the entire academic writing lifecycle, determining the appropriate submission type (e.g., Original Article, Research Note) and routing them through the required methodological and structural stages, ensuring adherence to public opinion and survey standards.

This skill assists researchers in strategically positioning their computer graphics and visualization research. It evaluates whether a contribution is truly "graphics-shaped" (demanding visual results and advancing graphics axes) and recommends the optimal venue (e.g., SIGGRAPH, CVPR, CHI, EGSR) and submission track (Dual-track or Journal-only) based on the nature and maturity of the work. It provides a crucial, high-leverage decision framework before committing to a submission.