Skill UI

This guide provides rigorous structural and disciplinary rules for authors submitting mobile-systems research to highly competitive conferences like MobiSys. It emphasizes moving beyond mere superlatives, mandating that all claims must be substantiated by explicit measurements of latency, energy, memory, and thermal budgets on real devices. Learn how to structure the paper to survive deep technical and systems-level peer review.

A comprehensive, step-by-step checklist designed for authors preparing manuscripts for submission to Manufacturing & Service Operations Management (M&SOM). It covers crucial elements including double-anonymous anonymization, strict formatting rules (32-page cap, structured abstract), proper departmental routing, and data/code disclosure requirements, ensuring readiness for the scholarOne portal submission.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and presenting complex analytical and empirical results for Operations Management journals (M&SOM). It emphasizes strict formatting rules, adhering to a hard page limit, and ensuring that all exhibits are self-contained and immediately convey the core insight (e.g., plotting policy structures, highlighting operational magnitudes, and using automated tools for generation).

This comprehensive guide helps authors determine if their research fits the scope of Nature Synthesis. It emphasizes that the core contribution must be a novel synthetic method or strategy (rather than just an application). The guide details specific requirements across organic, inorganic, materials, and electrochemical synthesis, covering method rigor, evidence standards, and journal formatting rules.

This comprehensive guide provides rigorous methodological rules for developing academic hypotheses. It emphasizes that every hypothesis (main effect, mediation, or moderation) must be justified by an explicit, named theoretical mechanism, moving beyond mere correlation or intuition. Essential for strengthening the theoretical foundation of quantitative research models.

A comprehensive guide for positioning security research submissions (e.g., for NDSS, USENIX). It teaches how to write the 'Related Work' section not as a mere literature review, but as a critical security argument that establishes genuine novelty (the 'delta') by distinguishing mechanisms, layers, and preconditions from prior art. Covers citation verification, handling concurrent work, and double-blind anonymity rules.

This skill provides a comprehensive framework for authors targeting top-tier AI conferences like NeurIPS. It guides researchers in refining their manuscript's narrative, ensuring the contribution meets the venue's standards for broad, high-novelty machine learning research. It covers topic fit, evidence bar requirements, structuring the argument, handling interdisciplinary claims, and navigating the specific submission cycle rules for maximizing acceptance chances.

A comprehensive guide for authors designing figures and tables for Nature Geoscience manuscripts. It outlines strict rules for adhering to a limited figure budget (4-6 display items), ensuring the lead figure immediately conveys the core Earth-system advance and its uncertainty, and maintaining high standards of cartography and data visualization for non-specialist readership.

This comprehensive guide provides expert methodologies for authors writing the 'Related Work' section for top-tier networked systems research papers (e.g., NSDI, SIGCOMM, OSDI). It details the required literature coverage gaps, strategic positioning techniques (e.g., delta by mechanism), academic verification protocols, and double-blind submission rules necessary to ensure the work is academically rigorous and highly competitive.

This guide provides a rigorous, multi-gate audit checklist for submitting academic conference papers. It covers critical steps from adhering to strict deadlines and formatting rules (e.g., page limits, templates) to passing complex anonymity checks (double-blind review), and ensuring policy compliance (e.g., plagiarism, resubmission bans). Use this checklist before your final submission.

A comprehensive guide detailing how to properly categorize and structure supplementary content for major academic conference submissions, such as NSDI. It outlines the rules for the four distinct containers (Body, References, Appendices, Auxiliary Material), helping authors determine if evidence is required for judging a claim (Body), merely supportive (Appendix), or critical for online review (Auxiliary). It also covers best practices for revision packets.

This specialized skill is designed for creating investor pitch decks for various funding rounds (Seed, Series A/B/C). It builds upon standard presentation rules, adding critical VC-focused constraints such as stage-appropriate metrics, the canonical narrative arc (Problem -> Solution -> Market -> Ask), and finance-grade number conventions. Use this only when actively raising capital, not for general reviews.