Skill UI

This specialized tool analyzes Git diffs against a stated development intent to detect scope creep. It identifies overly broad pull requests, unrelated files, dependency additions, public API renames, or configuration changes. It guides users on whether changes should be kept, split into separate commits, or if the connection requires explicit justification, ensuring clean and focused code merges.

This skill guides the transformation of empirical findings into generalizable, theoretically robust arguments suitable for top-tier social science publishing. It helps define core social mechanisms, establish scope conditions, and derive testable observable implications across diverse methodologies (e.g., quantitative, comparative, network). Use this when your initial results are strong but the overarching theoretical contribution needs explicit articulation.

This skill guides researchers on assessing if their academic project fits the scope and standards of a major social science journal. It provides a rigorous framework to test for general significance, methodological credibility, theoretical contribution, and adherence to strict word limits, helping authors effectively frame their work for a broad academic audience.

This comprehensive guide helps researchers determine if their academic research question aligns with the scope and criteria of top-tier strategic management journals (e.g., SMJ). It provides a multi-part fit test covering strategic DNA, unit of analysis (firm-level), theoretical stakes, and empirical identification challenges. It guides authors on sharpening their questions and choosing the correct specialized journal (SMJ, SEJ, GSJ).

A comprehensive guide for authors to determine if their manuscript tackles fundamental sociological problems (mechanism, structure, process) or if it is merely a policy evaluation. It helps authors avoid submitting to the wrong journal, ensuring their research advances theoretical sociological understanding.

A comprehensive guide for specifying the scope, domain, and inherent limits of a sociological theory (ST). This framework teaches how to move beyond mere disclaimers by articulating boundaries as strong theoretical claims. It guides the user to define boundaries across three dimensions: substantive scope (what phenomena are covered), level scope (micro, macro, meso), and contextual/historical scope (under what conditions the theory applies). Defining these bounds strengthens the theory by preventing overreach.

A comprehensive resource for academics targeting the South China Journal of Economics. It provides deep insight into the journal's scope, preferred topics (e.g., Greater Bay Area, open economy, digital economy), rigorous submission standards (anonymous review, fee-free), and structural requirements. Use this guide to evaluate manuscript fit, optimize framing, and reduce the risk of desk rejection before official submission.

This guide helps researchers structure a compelling theoretical argument for social science manuscripts, particularly those in social psychology. It emphasizes elevating mere findings into robust theoretical contributions by explicitly defining the social-psychological mechanism that connects macro social structures, processes, or interactions to individual levels (self, cognition, emotion). It guides users through defining scope conditions, observable implications, and the core structure–individual link.

This skill is designed to help researchers critically assess whether their project aligns with the scope of Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ). It guides users to pressure-test the core contribution: the link between social structure, process, and the individual. It helps frame the research question, determine the appropriate tradition (e.g., identity theory, symbolic interaction), and decide whether the final output should be a full Article or a focused Note.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for researchers to assess the scientific value, originality, and scope of their research findings. It helps determine if a topic is suitable for high-level journals like Scientia Sinica Informationis (SSI), guides the choice between Chinese and English versions, and advises on the appropriate journal fit and article column (e.g., Review, Paper, Letter). Ideal for pre-submission planning and refining research focus.

This guide helps researchers evaluate the scope and general significance of their theoretical computer science work. It introduces the 'breadth test' (corridor, lineage, technique) and a detailed routing map to advise whether the paper is best suited for a flagship, broad-scope venue like STOC, or a more specialized conference (e.g., SODA, ITCS, CCC). It provides a structured decision procedure for optimizing academic publication success.

This comprehensive guide helps authors determine if their cerebrovascular research is a strong fit for the journal Stroke (AHA/ASA). It outlines the specific scope, high evidence standards (e.g., prespecified outcomes, reporting guidelines like CONSORT/STROBE), house style, and detailed submission checklists required for academic publication in stroke and cerebrovascular medicine. It serves as a vital pre-submission feasibility assessment aid.