Skill UI

A comprehensive guide detailing the mandatory pre-submission steps for submitting manuscripts to the Journal of Operations Management (JOM) via the Wiley Research Exchange (ReX) portal. It covers departmental routing, cover letter protocols, double-anonymization rules, required checklists, formatting compliance, and handling disclosure requirements to ensure successful initial review.

A comprehensive guide for advanced empirical research in open economies. It outlines best practices for establishing causal inference by anchoring identification strategies in external or institutional shocks (e.g., tariffs, trade agreements, exchange rate reforms). The guide emphasizes modern critiques of standard methods like shift-share and gravity models, providing detailed protocols for DID, Bartik decomposition, and IV estimation to meet top-tier academic journal standards.

This comprehensive guide provides expert methodologies for authors writing the 'Related Work' section for top-tier networked systems research papers (e.g., NSDI, SIGCOMM, OSDI). It details the required literature coverage gaps, strategic positioning techniques (e.g., delta by mechanism), academic verification protocols, and double-blind submission rules necessary to ensure the work is academically rigorous and highly competitive.

A comprehensive guide to understanding the Public Opinion Quarterly (POQ) peer review process. It helps researchers critically assess their manuscripts against high academic standards, including double-blind review protocols, rigorous survey methodology checks (Total Survey Error, AAPOR compliance), and anticipating reviewer demands for code and data. Use this skill to stress-test your paper's robustness and maximize its chances of successful publication.

This guide details the rigorous methodology for conducting systematic literature reviews and meta-science pieces, particularly for integrative reviews in psychology (PoPS style). It instructs researchers on how to systematically gather evidence across multiple sub-areas by utilizing techniques like forward/backward snowballing, comprehensive database sweeps (e.g., PsycINFO), and developing detailed evidence matrices. The focus is on synthesizing findings and establishing replicable search protocols to ensure academic rigor and comprehensiveness, moving beyond simple summarization.

A comprehensive guide detailing the open science and reproducibility standards required for academic publications, especially those utilizing original data or conducting meta-science. It outlines critical steps such as data repository deposit, protocol preregistration, and reporting inter-rater reliability to ensure research methods are fully auditable.

This skill guides the planning of psychological studies to meet the highest academic standards. It provides comprehensive methodologies for performing power analysis, justifying sample sizes, and implementing preregistration protocols. Use this when initiating a new research project or developing a pre-analysis plan to ensure the study design is robust and transparent.

This skill guides authors in assembling a comprehensive transparency package for academic submissions (especially meta-analyses). It ensures adherence to Open Science principles by detailing requirements for protocol preregistration (PROSPERO/OSF), depositing the coded database, codebook, and analysis scripts. It is essential for proving the full reproducibility of quantitative research findings.

A comprehensive guide detailing best practices for achieving high reproducibility in recommender system research. It covers critical areas such as dataset version pinning, defining symmetric tuning protocols, selecting full-ranking metrics, handling non-determinism via multiple seeds, and structuring rigorous divergence analysis for academic publications.

A comprehensive guide for developing a rigorous, a-priori protocol for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in educational research. This tool ensures methodological transparency by defining the scope (PICO), eligibility criteria, search strategies, screening procedures, and synthesis plans before any data is collected, protecting the integrity of the research findings.

Provides a structured framework for vetting potential review topics for high-impact educational journals. It guides researchers through four critical fit tests—educational importance, literature maturity, current need for synthesis, and scope tractability—before committing to a full search or writing a protocol, ensuring the proposal genuinely advances academic understanding.

This router guides the entire lifecycle of scholarly reviews, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and critical integrative syntheses. It maps out the necessary steps—from question scoping and protocol registration (PRISMA) through systematic searching, framework building, data coding, and final submission/revision—ensuring methodological rigor for high-impact academic journals.