Skill UI

This guide provides comprehensive strategies for writing the Related Work section for submissions to AAAI. It teaches authors how to robustly position their paper's novelty by distinguishing contributions from both established archival literature and contemporaneous non-archival work (like arXiv papers). It also addresses specific reviewer expectations across various AI subfields (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR) and outlines clear structural templates for maximum impact.

This guide provides a comprehensive pre-submission audit checklist for AAAI conference technical papers. It covers crucial aspects like double-blind anonymity, page limits, reproducibility requirements, author policies, and adherence to the latest AI-use guidelines. Use this before submitting to mitigate risks of desk rejection or policy violation.

This guide helps researchers strategically decide if their AI project is a strong fit for the AAAI conference. It provides detailed criteria, including strong and weak signals, and routing logic to determine whether the work should be submitted to AAAI, or routed to specialized venues like NeurIPS, ICML, or domain-specific conferences (e.g., CVPR, KDD). Use it to refine your project's framing and maximize submission success.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and writing high-quality AI research manuscripts intended for major academic conferences (e.g., AAAI). It teaches how to structure the first page for maximum impact, clearly state contributions (method, theory, system, etc.), ensure two-column readability, and address ethical limitations to appeal to a broad, non-specialist committee audience.

This guide provides comprehensive instructions for packaging multiagent system (MARL) and game theory evidence for academic submissions, particularly for conferences like AAMAS. It emphasizes that the artifact must be inspectable, containing not just a trained model, but the game definition, environment code, opponent sets, and interaction protocols, ensuring rigorous reproducibility and reviewability.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing rebuttals following AAMAS preliminary reviews. It details the specific constraints (e.g., double-blind, no new results), the strategies for addressing diverse technical reviewers (such as game theorists, MARL experts, and systems engineers), and the structured pattern required to maximize the impact of a short response window.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for designing, auditing, and reporting high-rigor multi-agent experiments, especially in game theory and self-play systems. It emphasizes testing the *interaction* claim—such as convergence to equilibrium, truthful behavior, or emergent cooperation—against held-out opponents, populations, and strategic deviations, moving beyond simple single-agent leaderboard scores.

This guide outlines best practices for ensuring rigorous reproducibility of complex interaction claims, especially in game theory and multi-agent systems (MAS). It details required evidence for proofs, experimental setups (agents, opponents, seeds, compute), and consistency checks between the paper's claims and the provided artifacts. Essential for high-stakes academic submissions like AAMAS.

This comprehensive guide provides authors with a detailed checklist for the post-acceptance, camera-ready phase for Acta Automatica Sinica (AAS). It walks users through all necessary steps, including restoring full author details, applying the specific journal template, meticulous proofreading of formulas, figures, and references (GB/T 7714), and understanding publication and royalty procedures. Use this to ensure your manuscript is zero-defect before publication.

A comprehensive guide on writing literature reviews and related work sections, specifically tailored for high-impact journals like Acta Automatica Sinica (AAS). It teaches authors how to frame their research by focusing on the incremental contribution (delta), moving beyond simple literature listing to establish clear gaps, contrasting current limitations, and rigorously defining the work's novelty in a structured manner.

This skill is a specialized tool designed for scholars to assess the suitability and scope of their academic review article against the rigorous standards of top-tier management journals, such as Academy of Management Annals (AMA). It helps determine if a manuscript is merely a summary, or if it possesses the necessary synthesis, new organizing framework, and credible future research agenda required for publication in a highly selective venue.

This skill guides users through the process of assessing if their academic manuscript aligns with the scope and standards of *Accounting and Economics Research*. It covers journal positioning, required structure (abstract, citations), methodological rigor, and common pitfalls, helping researchers optimize their writing for specific academic venues.