Skill UI

This comprehensive guide assists authors in strategically positioning their computer vision manuscripts for the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). It covers conference fit assessment, manuscript re-framing, required evidence (e.g., ablations, baselines, failure modes), and structural advice to ensure the work aligns with ECCV's scope and current review policies. Use this tool for venue selection and submission preparation.

This skill provides comprehensive guidance for authors submitting Information Retrieval (IR) manuscripts to the European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR). It assists in strategically positioning the work by defining scope fit, structuring the evidence (e.g., baselines, error analysis), aligning with the rigorous standards of the European IR community, and guiding the differentiation of the contribution against similar top-tier venues like SIGIR or CIKM. Essential tool for pre-submission refinement.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting visualization research to the EuroVis conference. It provides expert advice on conference positioning, emphasizing specialist novelty and clear analytic value. The skill covers required evidence standards, contribution framing, and differentiating the work from other top venues like IEEE VIS, helping authors optimize their submission strategy.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to revise-and-resubmit reports in Experimental Economics (ExpEcon). It details how to triage complex reviewer comments, plan for necessary new data collection (new treatments, more sessions), address critical methodological concerns like deception or power deficits, and structure a highly persuasive, point-by-point response letter.

A comprehensive guide for authors writing Experimental Economics manuscripts. This skill helps you anticipate and proactively address the rigorous, double-blind objections typically raised by academic referees—such as concerns over deception, statistical power, omitted confounds, or impure treatment contrasts—before submission, ensuring methodological integrity and strengthening the manuscript.

This router guides researchers through the systematic process of preparing a manuscript for Experimental Economics (ExpEcon), the ESA's flagship journal. It identifies the correct specialized skills (e.g., theory modeling, robustness checks, referee strategy, rebuttal) needed at each stage, ensuring adherence to methodological rigor, including incentive compatibility and the no-deception norm. It is designed to help teams structure their research from initial design to final submission.

This guide provides a detailed playbook for responding to major or minor revisions of scientific manuscripts, particularly in agronomy and crop science. It teaches authors how to structure the rebuttal letter, systematically address specific reviewer concerns (e.g., scope, statistics, reproducibility), and professionally reconcile conflicting feedback while protecting the core scientific contribution to facilitate publication acceptance.

A comprehensive guide for researchers submitting papers to applied finance journals. It teaches how to 'red-team' your manuscript by proactively anticipating and strengthening defenses against the four most common fatal objections: lack of interest, inappropriate scope, weak identification, and unstated practical implication. Focuses on framing the contribution and optimizing the cover letter.

This guide instructs authors on crafting highly targeted and convincing robustness sections for empirical finance papers. Instead of merely adding volume, it teaches the concept of 'subtraction, then precision'—identifying specific alternative explanations (threats) a referee might raise (e.g., reverse causality, omitted variables) and selecting the minimal, most effective check to neutralize each threat. This aligns with the philosophy of top-tier financial journals that value new ideas over superficial testing.

This comprehensive skill acts as a pre-submission positioning tool for manuscripts targeting the Forum on Science and Technology in China. It helps researchers evaluate if their work aligns with the journal's scope, which covers technology strategy, industrial policy, and innovation systems. The guide details required methodologies, structural improvements, and common rejection pitfalls to maximize the manuscript's chances of acceptance.

This comprehensive guide provides a structured strategy for handling major scientific manuscript revisions and writing professional rebuttal letters. It instructs authors on how to systematically address every reviewer concern—especially regarding mechanism, scale, uncertainty, and reproducibility—while ensuring the revised manuscript remains perfectly synchronized with the archived data and code.

A rigorous self-assessment tool for academic manuscripts in game theory and economic behavior. It guides the identification of core assumptions, tests the logical architecture of proofs, and verifies the generalizability of results. It covers both theoretical proofs (e.g., equilibrium, mechanism design) and experimental designs, ensuring the argument withstands specialist scrutiny.