Skill UI

This comprehensive guide provides a structured strategy for handling major scientific manuscript revisions and writing professional rebuttal letters. It instructs authors on how to systematically address every reviewer concern—especially regarding mechanism, scale, uncertainty, and reproducibility—while ensuring the revised manuscript remains perfectly synchronized with the archived data and code.

A rigorous self-assessment tool for academic manuscripts in game theory and economic behavior. It guides the identification of core assumptions, tests the logical architecture of proofs, and verifies the generalizability of results. It covers both theoretical proofs (e.g., equilibrium, mechanism design) and experimental designs, ensuring the argument withstands specialist scrutiny.

A comprehensive guide for planning the submission of law-review articles, detailing the multi-submit and expedite mechanics used by top law students. It covers strategic timing (Spring vs. Fall seasons), establishing a tiered submission set (Reach, Match, Floor), and leveraging offers to accelerate review at highly ranked journals like HLR. Essential for maximizing publication chances in competitive academic environments.

This guide acts as the orchestrator for submitting scholarly articles to Harvard Law Review (HLR). It maps the complex, multi-stage lifecycle of legal academic writing, guiding users through every step from initial topic selection and preemption checks to argument structure, rigorous Bluebook citation, and final student-editor review. It is essential for understanding the unique, student-edited model and required submission strategy in legal academia.

This guide provides a specialized framework for authors targeting the IACR Conference on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems (CHES). It details the specific scope, evidence bar, and framing techniques required for cryptographic hardware papers, ensuring submissions meet the high standards of the community. It helps reposition work from journal or general CS styles.

A guide for writing theoretical computer science papers, detailing how to structure proofs and correctly incorporate computational evidence. It emphasizes matching arguments (e.g., upper/lower bounds) to claim shapes and ensures that computation (like SMT verification or exhaustive checks) is rigorous, reproducible, and serves only to certify a step, not replace the main theorem.

A comprehensive guide for authors on how to structure and write a persuasive, one-page rebuttal for major academic conferences (e.g., ICCV, CVPR). It outlines the strict constraints (one page, no external links, no new contributions) and provides a structured 7-day workflow, helping authors prioritize arguments, correct misstatements, and maintain a professional, factual tone under extreme time pressure.

A comprehensive guide to the rigorous, multi-stage peer review process for top-tier data engineering conferences like ICDE. It details the two-round structure, area-chair coordination, single-blind dynamics, and the high standards set by 'builder-heavy' reviewers. Use this to strategize paper submission, understand key evaluation dimensions (novelty, soundness, evaluation), and anticipate common review objections.

A comprehensive audit checklist designed for authors submitting data-engineering systems papers to major conferences like ICDE. It covers critical areas including IEEE formatting standards, round selection strategy, Microsoft CMT conflict declarations, and the requirement for supplemental material, ensuring authors mitigate common desk-reject risks.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing submissions for top-tier data mining conferences (e.g., ICDM). It emphasizes the critical strategy of preemptively addressing potential weaknesses—such as baselines, variance, scaling, and data leakage—directly within the submitted manuscript, as author rebuttals are often not permitted. Also provides strict guidelines for drafting anonymous, high-impact responses if a rebuttal window is available.

This comprehensive guide provides an end-to-end workflow for authors planning and submitting papers to the International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT). It covers the unique two-cycle submission calendar, advising on timing from initial abstract registration, first-cycle revisions, to final camera-ready submission and presentation strategy. Essential for managing academic publication timelines.

Provides a comprehensive guide for planning strategy within major academic conference review systems, such as OpenReview. It details the double-blind review lifecycle, author response strategies, managing public vs. private discussions, and understanding how permanent visibility impacts decision-making. Ideal for authors and reviewers preparing for high-stakes academic submissions.