Skill UI

This comprehensive guide provides a structured strategy for handling major scientific manuscript revisions and writing professional rebuttal letters. It instructs authors on how to systematically address every reviewer concern—especially regarding mechanism, scale, uncertainty, and reproducibility—while ensuring the revised manuscript remains perfectly synchronized with the archived data and code.

This guide provides rigorous instructions on developing the theoretical and analytical framework for Global Environmental Change (GEC) manuscripts. It instructs researchers on how to define complex, contested concepts (like resilience, vulnerability, and governance), specify causal mechanisms, and establish testable relationships. The goal is to elevate the paper from descriptive narrative to a load-bearing, interdisciplinary contribution.

This guide instructs authors on creating mandatory Data Availability Statements and building comprehensive replication materials for academic manuscripts. It covers best practices for data provenance, code management, and handling restricted data, ensuring research integrity and reproducibility.

This guide teaches how to strategically frame a scholarly contribution beyond a simple literature review. It instructs authors on identifying the core academic 'conversation,' pinpointing the precise tension or gap, and explicitly demonstrating how their theory advances the field. It also helps differentiate the work's scope from similar adjacent journals (e.g., OS, AMJ).

A comprehensive guide for developing theory in the field of Human Relations (HR). This skill helps users move beyond simple constructs and box-and-arrow diagrams to build substantive theoretical arguments. It focuses on defining generative social mechanisms, grounding theory in social processes, specifying boundary conditions, and aligning theoretical form (process vs. variance) with the research phenomenon.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing submissions for top-tier computer vision conferences like ICCV. It instructs writers on structuring papers for a generalist reviewer pool, maintaining the 'inclusive 8-page economy,' adopting a mechanism-first exposition style, and formulating claims that withstand rigorous review and rebuttal cycles. Essential for elevating technical prose to a publishable standard.

This comprehensive guide provides best practices for packaging supplemental materials and artifacts for top-tier academic conferences like ICDE. It instructs authors on how to build a robust, reproducible evidence chain, including parameterized workload generators, configuration scripts, and detailed logs. The goal is to ensure that reviewers can quickly and accurately validate all performance claims and technical contributions, making the work 'turnkey' and verifiable.

A comprehensive guide for academic authors detailing how to establish and maintain rigorous reproducibility in Machine Learning research papers (e.g., ICLR). It instructs on mapping every central claim to verifiable evidence, including recording seeds, variance, specific compute budgets (training vs. inference), data preprocessing scripts, and ethical considerations. The statement must function as a public contract for the scientific community.

This comprehensive guide outlines the necessary theoretical rigor for algorithms and models submitted to top-tier computational journals. It instructs authors on how to formally state mathematical formulations, rigorously prove model validity, establish convergence, and quantify complexity (e.g., approximation ratios, finite termination). It provides specialized paths for exact methods, metaheuristics, and ML-enhanced OR, ensuring that the theoretical advancements fully support and rationalize the experimental findings.

A comprehensive guide for positioning highly technical research in top-tier academic venues like ISCA. It instructs authors on deep literature surveying across multiple databases (ACM, IEEE, dblp, arXiv), structuring the 'related work' section using structural differentiation (mechanism delta), and adhering to double-blind review guidelines. Essential for advanced technical paper writing.

This guide provides comprehensive style guidelines for submitting articles to the Journal of the American Academy of Religion (JAAR). It specifically instructs authors on converting traditional footnote-based citations to the required in-text author-date system. Key areas covered include formatting the alphabetized, year-keyed reference list, handling primary-source texts, and adhering to house conventions like italicizing foreign words.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and drafting the editor-facing cover letter when submitting a manuscript to the Journal of the American Chemical Society (JACS). It instructs authors on how to clearly articulate the research advance, broad intellectual interest, and suitability (fit) for the journal, serving as a strategic pitch rather than a repetition of the abstract.