Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for security researchers to determine the optimal top-tier conference venue for their paper. It provides structured 'fit tests'—including the wire test, deployment envelope test, and adversary ownership test—and a routing table to assess whether the work belongs at NDSS, IEEE S&P, USENIX Security, or related venues, maximizing the chance of successful publication.

This comprehensive guide provides a structured workflow for academic submissions to the NDSS security symposium. It maps out the distinct summer and fall submission cycles, detailing critical milestones from the initial paper deadline through early-reject, rebuttal, notification, and final camera-ready stages. It emphasizes strategic backward planning, managing the sensitive disclosure clock for vulnerabilities, and positioning research within the broader security research lifecycle.

This guide assists researchers in transforming bloated or loosely structured academic manuscripts into the terse, plain IMRAD format required by top-tier journals like NEJM. It focuses on maximizing clarity, enforcing claim-first results based on statistical evidence, curbing over-stated clinical implications, and ensuring the discussion explicitly covers limitations and necessary scope restriction.

A comprehensive guide for refining machine learning research papers tailored for NeurIPS submission. It teaches how to structure introductions, calibrate claims with evidence, explicitly state limitations, and address mandatory academic checklist items (e.g., reproducibility, broader impact). Use this skill to transform technical writing into a reviewer-proof, high-impact academic manuscript.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing accepted academic papers for artifact evaluation at major conferences (e.g., NSDI). It details how to package code, traces, and testbed recipes to ensure permanent public availability, achieve recognition badges (Functionality, Availability, Reproducibility), and meet community award criteria. Learn best practices for reproducibility and structured submission.

This guide helps researchers determine if their sustainability science manuscript is suitable for One Earth. It analyzes the journal’s scope, which focuses on interdisciplinary solutions, natural systems, and social interventions. The skill covers method standards, required structure (e.g., STAR Methods), and specific advice for framing research for high-impact, transformative publications.

This guide details the rigorous, multi-phase artifact evaluation process for research papers submitted to OOPSLA. It covers best practices for creating robust, reproducible, and reusable software artifacts, aiming to achieve Functional, Reusable, and Available badges. Learn how to structure your repository, map claims explicitly, and pass the 'kick-the-tires' dry run, treating every evaluator as a hostile fresh VM.

This guide helps researchers evaluate whether their high-impact optics or photonics manuscript meets the stringent criteria of Optica. It covers ideal scope (e.g., nanophotonics, quantum optics), required experimental rigor (quantitative measurements, state-of-the-art benchmarking), article structure (concise, load-bearing figures), and official submission guidelines, ensuring the work is framed for broad scientific interest.

A comprehensive guide for selecting and defending appropriate research designs—including qualitative, quantitative, experimental, and computational methods—for organizational science manuscripts. It emphasizes matching the method to the theoretical contribution and level of analysis, rather than solely focusing on causal identification. Learn how to structure your argument, ensure transparency, and build robust mechanism evidence.

This router guides researchers through the entire lifecycle of an Organization Science manuscript, from initial topic selection and theory development to data analysis, contribution framing, and final submission. It does not replace specialized skills but provides a structured roadmap, helping users determine the correct next step and maintain coherence throughout the complex academic writing process.

This skill guides the transformation of a literature review from a mere descriptive catalogue into a highly focused, argumentative structure. It teaches how to synthesize existing research to identify a specific, unresolved theoretical tension or assumption failure within a named scholarly conversation. The goal is to precisely position a new theory or mechanism as the necessary resolution to this gap.

A comprehensive guide for rigorously positioning an Operations Research (OR) manuscript against prior art. It teaches authors to move beyond vague 'gap' statements by constructing a precise, technical delta against 3-5 closest papers. Focus areas include weakening assumptions, improving bounds, enhancing algorithmic complexity, and defining new operational regimes, often presented in a structured comparison table to satisfy technical reviewers.