Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for constructing rigorous and structured exhibits (tables, figures, theorems) for Operations Research (OR) manuscripts, adhering to INFORMS house style. It details requirements for formal statement layout, comparison tables against prior work, computational results, and performance plots, ensuring maximum academic rigor and reproducibility.

A comprehensive guide detailing the necessary author response techniques for high-stakes academic conferences, particularly focusing on the shift from traditional rebuttals to structured, mandated revision cycles (shepherding). It covers pre-submission pre-mortems, managing mandated changes using a change matrix, and maintaining professional rigor throughout the review process. Ideal for PhD students and researchers.

A comprehensive guide detailing the rigorous peer-review pipeline of top academic conferences (like OSDI). It covers multi-round double-blind review, strategies for conditional acceptance, heavy shepherding, and optimizing your paper's structure to survive early triage rounds. Essential reading for researchers aiming to publish high-impact, publishable work.

A comprehensive guide for researchers deciding the optimal venue for systems projects, such as OSDI, SOSP, or NSDI. It provides structured tests (built-and-measured, operational experience) and scoping criteria to help authors determine if their work is a research contribution or a production-level lesson, ensuring projects are routed to the correct academic conference before significant time is spent writing.

This skill automates the complex process of transforming raw research papers (PDF or URL) into structured, knowledge graph-ready resources for OpenViking. It executes a rigorous workflow: reading the entire paper, compiling an ARA-style artifact directory, validating the content against established schemas, and finally ingesting the structured data into the OpenViking knowledge base using the `ov add-resource` command. It ensures all evidence, claims, and logical relationships are captured systematically.

This guide provides a detailed model of the PerCom conference review process, covering double-blind review, the three-TPC-member evaluation model, the early-rejection gate, and the bounded rebuttal stage. It clarifies how authors should structure their submissions to succeed in this single-round, non-revisionary academic environment, differentiating it sharply from journal cycles.

This comprehensive guide provides a structured framework for authors responding to major or minor revisions (R&R) decisions from academic journals. It teaches authors how to build a rigorous, point-by-point rebuttal letter that strengthens the core argument, integrates missed literature, and addresses reviewer concerns strategically, ensuring the revision elevates the research intervention rather than simply adding word count.

This guide provides authors with comprehensive best practices for submitting research artifacts (e.g., compilers, benchmarks, proofs) for post-acceptance evaluation at PLDI. It details how to structure the submission, ensuring reproducibility, containerization, and clear documentation to achieve Functional, Reusable, or Available badges.

Provides comprehensive guidelines for meeting high-level scientific publication standards, detailing the mandatory deposition of raw data (sequences, structures, datasets) and analysis code into approved public repositories. Learn how to obtain persistent identifiers (DOI/Accession) and ensure the reproducibility and integrity of your research findings for journals like PNAS.

This guide details the mandatory structure and best practices for submitting research articles to PNAS. It covers the proper order of sections (Title, Abstract, Introduction, Results, Discussion, etc.), how to manage length budgets, correctly place Materials and Methods within the main text, and ensure accurate Classification and keywords are chosen at submission.

A comprehensive guide for authors structuring and formatting scientific manuscripts for PNAS Nexus. It details selecting the appropriate article type (e.g., Research Report, Review), managing page length budgets, ensuring the Materials and Methods section remains in the main text, and organizing results logically by argument, not chronology. Essential for successful scientific publishing.

This skill guides authors to structure and articulate the core contribution of a Production and Operations Management (POM) manuscript. It ensures that the research explicitly addresses both a knowledge gap (theory) and a practice gap (operational levers), helping bridge the gap between technical results and actionable managerial insight required by top academic venues.