Skill UI

This guide assists in elevating isolated findings into generalizable theories of international politics. It provides a structured framework for building arguments—whether empirical, formal, or constructivist—by explicitly defining core international mechanisms, scope conditions, and testable observable implications, ensuring the theory's portability across different global cases and institutions.

This guide helps researchers determine the primary focus of their work—whether it lies in Information Processing (algorithms, estimation) or Sensor Platforms, Tools, and Design Methods (hardware, deployment). It provides a structured methodology for selecting the most appropriate academic venue (e.g., SenSys, MobiSys, INFOCOM) based on the project's technical contribution and maturity.

This guide provides structured rules for authors writing sensor-systems or information-processing papers. It emphasizes leading with the physical sensing problem, requiring real-hardware measurements for energy, latency, and ground truth, and adhering to strict academic formatting constraints. Use this when revising submissions to ensure technical depth and practical deployability.

Provides a detailed and rigorous workflow guide for managing a full academic conference submission cycle (e.g., ISCA). It advises researchers on working backward from critical deadlines—from topic selection and baseline freezing to abstract writing, paper submission, handling reviews, and generating camera-ready artifacts—treating the academic process like a structured engineering schedule.

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous process of transforming a submitted ITCS paper into the final, open-access LIPIcs camera-ready version. It covers critical steps including switching to the required `lipics-v2021` LaTeX class, fully re-attributing author identity (names, ORCIDs, funding), completing structured metadata (ACM CCS, keywords), incorporating reviewer-suggested fixes, and ensuring compliance with strict production standards set by the Dagstuhl editorial office.

This skill acts as the central orchestrator for writing and submitting manuscripts to the Journal of the American Academy of Religion (JAAR). It guides authors through the entire writing lifecycle, emphasizing the critical 'reframing test' to ensure the work addresses issues of broad, fundamental interest to the study of religion, rather than remaining confined to a narrow subfield. It provides a structured path from initial idea generation to final submission and revision.

This skill guides authors in transforming raw experimental data into a compelling, logically structured scientific narrative suitable for top-tier journals like JACS. It teaches how to explicitly define the 'chemical advance' by building an evidence-backed claim chain: Problem $ ightarrow$ Advance $ ightarrow$ Evidence $ ightarrow$ Significance. It ensures that every claim of novelty is rigorously supported by data and compares the work explicitly against the closest prior art.

This comprehensive router guides researchers through the entire process of developing, analyzing, and submitting a manuscript to the Journal of Accounting and Economics (JAE). It provides a structured roadmap, helping users determine the next critical step—from initial topic selection and theory development to advanced econometrics, contribution framing, and final submission preparation. It ensures that the work maintains a rigorous, economics-based argument using archival data, preventing common pitfalls like vague ideas or insufficient identification strategies.

This guide polishes academic prose to meet the rigorous standards of top economics and accounting journals (e.g., JAE). It ensures the writing is precise, hypothesis-driven, and structured according to positive-accounting tradition. It covers mandatory elements like structured sections (numbered), Harvard author-date referencing, and required packaging (Highlights, Keywords, JEL codes).

This guide provides a structured framework for drafting a point-by-point rebuttal letter after receiving a major revision decision from a top-tier academic journal. It emphasizes strategic communication, prioritizing the Senior Editor's concerns, addressing technical issues in the appropriate disciplinary 'currency,' and maintaining a developmental, professional tone to maximize the chances of acceptance.

A comprehensive heuristic tool and guide for authors targeting JAMA. It assesses manuscript fit, methodological rigor (including adherence to CONSORT, PRISMA, STROBE guidelines), structured abstract formatting, and the latest AMA house style. Use this before submitting a high-impact clinical or scientific manuscript to ensure compliance with top-tier journal standards.

This guide provides a structured checklist and framework for researchers to assess whether their clinical study meets the general-medical-importance bar of top-tier journals, such as JAMA. It helps authors determine if their findings are broadly relevant to practicing clinicians, if the evidence level is sufficient, and if the article type matches the journal's requirements, preventing premature submission.