Skill UI

This guide provides a structured methodology for authors responding to peer reviews in technical conferences (e.g., MobiSys). It emphasizes strict scope discipline, focusing only on correcting factual errors or answering specific reviewer questions. The process requires anchoring all claims to existing evidence and maintaining a double-blind approach to maximize acceptance chances.

This framework guides the creation of mandatory STAR Methods, ensuring scientific manuscripts meet the highest standards of transparency and reproducibility. It mandates the systematic inclusion of Key Resources Tables (KRT), detailed resource availability, experimental model specifications, step-by-step methods, and consolidated statistical analysis (QSA). Ideal for researchers needing to structure complex biological or chemical research findings for publication.

A comprehensive guide on structuring and writing high-impact scientific summaries, specifically modeled after the standards of journals like Molecular Cell. This skill teaches how to transform raw research findings into a single, polished, unstructured paragraph (~150 words). The summary must explicitly name the molecular mechanism, provide quantified evidence, establish the biological context, and articulate the physiological significance, ensuring the writing is clear for a specialized molecular biology readership.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to top Operations Management journals, such as M&SOM. It teaches how to translate complex analytical or empirical results into explicit, actionable operational contributions. The focus is on making the managerial implication, the core operational decision, and the structured abstract components clearly defined, moving the emphasis away from methodological novelty.

A comprehensive, step-by-step checklist designed for authors preparing manuscripts for submission to Manufacturing & Service Operations Management (M&SOM). It covers crucial elements including double-anonymous anonymization, strict formatting rules (32-page cap, structured abstract), proper departmental routing, and data/code disclosure requirements, ensuring readiness for the scholarOne portal submission.

A comprehensive guide for the late-stage polishing of academic manuscripts for submission to M&SOM. It focuses on restructuring the narrative to lead with the operational insight, developing a structured, jargon-free abstract, controlling mathematical notation, and adhering to strict INFORMS author-year citation styles and page limits.

A detailed guide for authors submitting to top-tier management journals, focusing on responding to reviewer comments (R&R). It provides a structured methodology for drafting point-by-point rebuttal letters, ensuring alignment between the revised manuscript and the written response. The guide emphasizes prioritizing text revision, strengthening identification, mechanism, and policy implications.

This router provides a structured workflow guide for writing and revising academic manuscripts, specifically tailored for top-tier journals like Management World. It helps users determine the next critical step—from topic selection and literature review to causal identification and policy implication—ensuring a cohesive and strategically sound paper structure.

This comprehensive guide equips authors with a structured framework for writing the Related Work section for top-tier NLP conferences (e.g., NAACL). It emphasizes tracking methodological, data, and task lineages, ensuring citation precision across Findings, workshops, and preprints, and culminating in a single, falsifiable "delta sentence" to precisely position the novel contribution.

This comprehensive guide provides a structured project management workflow for academic research targeting the NAACL conference. It addresses the unique challenge of NAACL's irregular calendar (skipped years) by providing a detailed backward planning timeline, managing milestones (data freeze, paper freeze, ARR upload), and implementing a critical decision tree for committing, waiting, or rerouting submissions when conference windows shift.

This guide provides a structured methodology for academic writing, enabling researchers to move beyond stating a mere 'lack of research.' It teaches users how to rigorously pinpoint the theoretical gap—such as an unaddressed mechanism, an inexplicable anomaly, or an undefined boundary condition—that existing theories fail to explain. Essential for strengthening the theoretical depth and academic impact of scholarly papers.

A comprehensive workflow router designed to guide researchers through the entire process of preparing manuscripts for top-tier business journals, such as the Nankai Business Review. This guide does not replace specialized skills but provides a structured, stage-gated approach covering theory gap identification, hypothesis development, rigorous measurement validation (e.g., SEM, validity), contextualization, and strategic revision (R&R). It ensures that the paper meets the necessary standards for theoretical contribution and empirical depth.