Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for establishing rigorous causal claims in law and economics. It details advanced econometric methodologies (DiD, RDD, IV, Event Study) required to defend the identification strategy—the mapping from a legal variation to the causal estimand—meeting the high standards of top academic journals.

A comprehensive guide for structuring marketing research designs, particularly for journals like the Journal of Marketing (JM). It teaches researchers how to select the most appropriate method (e.g., field experiment, survey, panel data, qualitative study) that directly addresses a substantive, managerially relevant claim. The focus is on achieving both internal validity (establishing causality) and external validity (realism in the market), ensuring the method serves the core business insight rather than being an end in itself.

A comprehensive guide for researchers conducting advanced data analysis and reporting for top marketing journals. It details selecting the appropriate econometric estimator (e.g., ANOVA, DiD, IV, mediation models) based on the study design (experimental, observational, panel). It emphasizes meeting rigorous journal mandates, including exact p-values, standard errors, and effect sizes, and linking statistical findings to practical managerial claims.

This guide assists researchers in aligning their study design—whether behavioral (lab/field experiments) or modeling-econometric (IV/DiD/RDD)—with the rigorous standards required by the Journal of Marketing Research (JMR). It covers best practices for causal identification, power analysis, structural estimation, and meeting journal-level expectations like replication and Web Appendix planning.

This skill provides a rigorous framework for designing academic studies, particularly for high-impact psychological journals. It guides researchers to proactively address common methodological pitfalls such as common-method variance (CMV), unmodeled nesting, and construct validity gaps. Topics covered include temporal separation, multi-level modeling, advanced causal inference techniques (DiD, IV), and pre-registration best practices, strengthening the plan before data collection.

This workflow orchestrates the entire manuscript submission process for the Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP). It guides authors by ensuring the paper addresses two critical standards: a theoretical contribution to I-O science, and high rigor in design and measurement. It routes users through specific stages—from topic selection and theory development to study design, data analysis, and revision.

This guide helps researchers rigorously evaluate whether their operations management or supply chain research topic is suitable for the Journal of Operations Management (JOM). It employs a four-screen test to ensure the topic meets academic criteria: operations must be the core phenomenon, the study must be empirically grounded, it must advance theory, and it must maintain practical relevance for managers.

This skill helps authors determine if their allergy, asthma, or clinical immunology study is suitable for submission to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (JACI). It provides detailed guidelines on scope fit, required evidence rigor, reporting standards (CONSORT, STROBE), and structural elements, acting as a comprehensive pre-submission aid for academic writing.

A comprehensive skill designed for authors targeting the Journal of Clinical Oncology (JCO). It provides an exhaustive checklist covering the journal's high academic standards, required evidence depth (such as Phase III randomized controlled trials), appropriate study scope (solid tumors, biomarkers), mandatory formatting, and the latest submission guidelines. Use this tool to optimize your manuscript and improve its suitability for publication in a top-tier oncology journal.

This skill guides authors to evaluate if their consumer behavior manuscript meets the high theoretical and methodological standards of the Journal of Consumer Research (JCR). It focuses on assessing the theoretical contribution, the necessity of multi-study process evidence (mediation/moderation), and adherence to academic publishing best practices, helping authors refine their framing and anticipate desk-reject risks before submission. Note: This is a guide, not a substitute for official submission guidelines.

This guide targets the Journal of Physical Education, a CSSCI-level journal emphasizing school physical education, sport humanities, and social science. It is ideal for researchers studying PE reform, youth fitness, and sport policy. Submissions must demonstrate strong theoretical grounding and problem consciousness, analyzing educational, social, or health mechanisms rather than merely summarizing teaching experiences.

This guide helps authors structure and refine academic exhibits (tables and figures) for highly selective policy journals (like JPP&M). It addresses the crucial need to cater to a dual audience: methods-literate reviewers requiring technical detail (estimators, SEs, clustering) and policy practitioners needing immediate, decision-relevant magnitude (e.g., percentage points, dollars). It covers best practices for Event-Study, DiD, RDD, and forest plots, ensuring the presentation is actionable and adheres to strict page limits.