Skill UI

This skill guides researchers through drafting a robust and credible response to major academic revisions (R&R) from top-tier journals, particularly in institutional economics. It teaches how to systematically decode editor feedback, separate core conceptual challenges from technical gaps, and structure a point-by-point reply that addresses deal-breakers effectively, ensuring the response is substantive and highly responsive.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for advanced theory development, crucial for high-impact academic writing, particularly in management sciences. It trains authors to move beyond simple data correlation by structuring hypotheses through explicit theoretical mechanisms: Antecedent $\rightarrow$ Mechanism $\rightarrow$ Outcome. It advises on building a robust theoretical contribution, defining boundary conditions, and organizing meta-analyses or systematic reviews.

This guide helps academic researchers scope their research questions and determine the appropriate contribution type (empirical paper, meta-analysis, or systematic review) for top-tier general management journals. It teaches authors how to ensure their work has a broad, general-management theoretical contribution rather than being too niche, and how to strategically compare fit against competing academic journals.

A comprehensive guide for authors managing a Revise-and-Resubmit (R&R) from the Journal of Marketing Research (JMR). It outlines how to systematically address dual concerns—research rigor (statistics, identification, replication) and theoretical substance (contribution)—while crafting a point-by-point response letter. It emphasizes using the Web Appendix to manage new analyses without exceeding the page limit.

This tool provides a systematic framework for formalizing complex management and business scenarios into a mathematically well-posed decision problem. It guides users through identifying the five critical elements: decision makers, decision variables, information structure, uncertainty sources, and objectives/constraints. This is essential for ensuring that subsequent models (optimization, game theory, etc.) are correctly structured and viable for rigorous research.

This guide provides a comprehensive strategy for writing a formal rebuttal letter after a 'Revise and Resubmit' (R&R) phase for high-impact academic journals. It details how to address every reviewer comment systematically, strengthen theoretical contributions, integrate added methodological rigor (like alternative models and CMV checks), and maintain full transparency while keeping the manuscript anonymized.

A comprehensive guide for responding to peer reviews and compiling revision manuscripts for high-impact academic journals, specifically tailored for the Journal on Communications (JOC). It teaches authors how to structure closed-loop responses (Opinion—Response—Location), maintain a professional tone, provide verifiable evidence, and systematically address complex or conflicting critiques throughout the multi-round publication process.

A comprehensive guide for ensuring the robustness of empirical findings, particularly for submissions to top-tier economic journals. This method moves beyond simply showing that coefficients remain significant, focusing instead on defending the core economic interpretation by systematically ruling out alternative mechanisms, structural assumptions, and potential sources of bias. It guides the development of a rigorous 'robustness battery.'

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to major revisions in academic journals, particularly in policy and marketing research. It teaches how to systematically convert vague reviewer demands (e.g., "improve contribution") into concrete, visible analytical work, ensuring the response is both methodologically rigorous and policy-relevant.

Provides a systematic guide for authors to assess if their academic manuscript aligns with a specific journal's scope. It helps authors determine the primary contribution—whether it should be framed as quantitative measurement, forecasting, or method application, rather than relying solely on causal inference, thereby guiding optimal revisions and submission routes.

This comprehensive suite provides systematic checks to ensure spatial estimates are robust against methodological choices. It addresses core econometric issues such as Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP), boundary arbitrariness, spatial sorting, and spillover effects. Use this guide when submitting research to high-impact journals (like JUE) to demonstrate the reliability and stability of spatial relationships.

A comprehensive guide for structuring and writing professional rebuttal letters in academia. It teaches authors how to respond to highly specialized journal reviewer comments (R&R), particularly addressing challenging methodological points common in economics, such as open-economy fit, shift-share inference, and GVC measurement. It emphasizes professional tone, systematic rebuttal structure, and linking changes directly to the revised manuscript.