Skill UI

A comprehensive guide on structuring a rebuttal letter for rigorous academic journals (like IER) following major revisions. It teaches authors how to systematically triage referee comments into categories (correctness, generality, minor points), ensuring the response is evidence-based, easy to verify, and highly persuasive to both the editor and referees.

A comprehensive toolkit designed for international macroeconomics research, ensuring that headline estimates are stable and reliable. It systematically tests the robustness of findings against common methodological threats, such as leaving out individual countries, changing sample periods, controlling for global common shocks, or varying estimation specifications. Essential for submitting high-impact academic papers.

This router guides authors through the complex, multi-stage process of optimizing a manuscript for submission to the IMF Economic Review (IMFER). It systematically diagnoses bottlenecks—from topic selection and literature positioning to model robustness and rebuttal strategy—ensuring the paper meets the high standards of international macroeconomics and policy relevance.

A comprehensive guide for planning and drafting responses to major revisions (R&R) in Information Systems research. It teaches systematic prioritization, focusing first on the Senior Editor's concerns, addressing genre-specific reviewer critiques (e.g., proofs, identification, evaluation), and structuring the response using an electronic companion for maximum impact.

A comprehensive guide for authors responding to journal reviewers' reports (e.g., JACS). It details how to systematically triage comments into data-required, clarification, or disagreement; how to structure a professional, point-by-point response letter; and how to maintain scientific rigor when performing necessary experiments.

This router guides authors through the complex, multi-stage process of preparing a high-impact chemistry manuscript for the Journal of the American Chemical Society (JACS). It does not replace specialized skills but rather dictates the correct sequence of actions—from scope checking and data framing to revision and final submission—ensuring a rigorous and systematic workflow.

This comprehensive guide helps researchers evaluate whether a clinical or health-services study is appropriate for publication in JAMA Internal Medicine. It details the journal's high bar for methodological rigor, including requirements for randomized trials (CONSORT), observational studies (STROBE), and systematic reviews (PRISMA). It covers everything from study design and statistical reporting to addressing potential desk-reject triggers, ensuring authors submit high-quality, impactful research.

This comprehensive guide maps various study designs (e.g., RCT, Observational, Systematic Review) to mandatory reporting checklists and flow diagrams (such as CONSORT, PRISMA, STROBE, STARD). It ensures researchers meet the rigorous, standardized reporting requirements for top-tier medical journal submissions.

This guide provides a strategic framework for authors responding to major revisions (R&R) decisions from top academic journals. It details how to plan, revise, and write a disciplined point-by-point rebuttal letter. Key areas covered include prioritizing the handling editor's primary concerns, strengthening the core entrepreneurial contribution, and systematically addressing complex methodological issues such as selection bias, survivorship, and endogeneity.

This guide provides a comprehensive checklist and systematic approach for enhancing the reproducibility of research in Computer Graphics and CAD. It addresses the inherent sensitivity of graphics and geometry results to environment variables, random seeds, rendering parameters, and data versions, ensuring that published results can be reliably replicated by reviewers and readers.

This guide assists researchers in validating if their proposed topic aligns with the scope of the Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics (JCAD&CG). It systematically checks the core contribution, focusing on graphics, geometry, visualization, VR/AR, and CAD/CAE techniques, helping authors ensure sufficient technical increment and preventing rejection due to scope mismatch.

A comprehensive workflow guide mapping the entire academic submission lifecycle for JCAD&CG, from initial topic selection to final camera-ready stage. It organizes 12 key stages, identifying critical deliverables, decision points, and necessary steps at every phase to ensure a smooth and systematic publication process.