Skill UI

A comprehensive audit tool designed to ensure academic paper compliance before submitting to major AI conferences like NeurIPS. It systematically checks adherence to the CFP, double-blind anonymity across all assets (PDF, code, data, supplement), correct track selection, and avoids common desk-rejection pitfalls, ensuring the submission is ready for OpenReview.

This comprehensive guide details the strategy and structure required for authors responding to major or minor revisions (R&R) of academic manuscripts. It teaches how to systematically address multiple, often conflicting, interdisciplinary reviewer comments, focusing on point-by-point responses, conflict reconciliation, and enhancing the overall manuscript argument to maximize acceptance chances.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for authors responding to major journal revisions. It teaches how to structure a technical, point-by-point rebuttal, systematically closing proof gaps, strengthening assumptions, incorporating missing baselines, and preparing the entire codebase and data for professional reproducibility review.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for writing *Progress in Human Geography* manuscripts. It guides authors through the entire writing process by routing the piece based on its lifecycle stage, genre (Review Article vs. Progress Report), and whether the topic is truly review-worthy. It systematically ensures the resulting work is synthetic, critical, and focused on developing a core academic argument.

This comprehensive guide teaches researchers how to systematically respond to peer reviews for high-impact journals. It covers triaging reviewer comments into 'Do,' 'Defend,' 'Defer,' and 'Do-partial' buckets, prioritizing necessary experiments, structuring the response letter, and maintaining a respectful, evidence-led tone. Essential for navigating the publication process and preserving claim integrity.

This guide details the rigorous methodology for conducting systematic literature reviews and meta-science pieces, particularly for integrative reviews in psychology (PoPS style). It instructs researchers on how to systematically gather evidence across multiple sub-areas by utilizing techniques like forward/backward snowballing, comprehensive database sweeps (e.g., PsycINFO), and developing detailed evidence matrices. The focus is on synthesizing findings and establishing replicable search protocols to ensure academic rigor and comprehensiveness, moving beyond simple summarization.

A comprehensive guide for constructing academic exhibits, such as conceptual framework diagrams, 'who-found-what' summary tables, and meta-science plots, for literature review and perspective pieces. It ensures adherence to APA style, emphasizes comparing like-with-like constructs, and mandates systematic data sourcing to maintain scientific credibility and reproducibility.

A comprehensive guide for authors writing for high-impact journals like Physical Review Letters (PRL). It addresses the strict 'deductible budget' model where figures, equations, references, and text all count against a single limit. Provides systematic steps to triage content—such as moving derivations to Supplemental Material, compressing figures, and tightening prose—to ensure the core scientific claims remain clear and within publication guidelines.

A comprehensive guide for designing and documenting systematic literature searches for meta-analyses or systematic reviews. It ensures reproducibility by covering multiple databases (e.g., PsycINFO, PubMed), controlled vocabulary, grey literature, and adhering strictly to PRISMA-S guidelines. It helps build a robust, traceable research pool.

This guide provides a structured framework for responding to reviewers and editors regarding a meta-analysis or systematic synthesis. Because such revisions often involve expanding the search, changing eligibility criteria, or adding complex bias diagnostics, the response must maintain impeccable internal statistical consistency across all tables, figures, and estimates. It ensures all methodological changes are clearly propagated and justified.

A comprehensive pre-submission checklist for authors submitting research syntheses (such as meta-analyses or systematic reviews) to Psychological Bulletin via APA Editorial Manager. It guides authors through critical checks, including proper masking (anonymizing author identity), adherence to APA 7th edition standards, abstract length constraints (≤ 250 words), and mandatory completion of reporting frameworks like MARS or PRISMA.

This skill guides researchers on whether a proposed research topic is suitable for a high-level synthesis journal (like Psychological Bulletin). It assesses the existing literature's depth, general academic significance, and whether the contribution is synthesizing prior findings. It determines the most appropriate synthesis methodology—such as meta-analysis, systematic review, or qualitative meta-synthesis—by comparing the nature of the pooled data.