Skill UI

This guide provides expert recommendations on organizing supplementary material for academic papers. It teaches authors how to distinguish between load-bearing evidence (for the main text) and reassuring, secondary data (for the internet appendix). Proper indexing, cross-referencing, and material triage are critical for creating a lean, navigable, and highly persuasive manuscript.

This guide outlines the advanced, disciplined strategies for managing author communication throughout the academic publishing lifecycle of a major conference paper (e.g., FOCS). It covers three critical phases: writing pre-emptive rebuttals before submission, handling limited official queries during review, and executing a disciplined resubmission protocol after rejection. Focuses on turning reviewer critiques into concrete textual improvements rather than defensive appeals.

This guide provides methodological rigor for designing studies—including manipulative experiments, observational gradient analyses, and process modeling—in the context of global change biology. It helps researchers anticipate and address critical reviewer concerns regarding scale, replication, confounding factors, and the limits of causal inference, ensuring the design can support strong claims of driver-to-response relationships.

This skill guides authors in developing strong, portable, and highly structured theoretical arguments for manuscripts submitted to top journals like Governance. It focuses on moving beyond mere description by identifying causal mechanisms, defining rigorous scope conditions, and establishing testable, comparative concepts. It helps ensure the theory can travel across different cases and contexts.

This skill provides a detailed guide for author self-assessment, determining if a manuscript in theology, biblical studies, or religious history meets the high scholarly standards of top-tier academic journals (like the Harvard Theological Review). It emphasizes the necessity of strong textual criticism, philological rigor, and building arguments based on primary sources in original languages, ensuring the work is academically robust and methodologically sound.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide to elevating academic legal writing to the rigorous standard of a Harvard Law Review (HLR). It focuses on structural discipline, including crafting compelling introductions (problem, claim, stakes, roadmap), maintaining the distinct text-vs-footnote division of labor, and adopting a plain, formal, and active prose style for maximum readability by generalist scholars.

This comprehensive guide details the stringent process of preparing an accepted scholarly paper for publication in LIPIcs proceedings. It covers mandatory steps including converting to the specific `lipics-v2021` class, systematic de-anonymization (restoring authors, ORCIDs, and acknowledgements), completing rich metadata (ACM CCS, keywords, funding), and reconciling the final body text with the public full version. Essential reading for ensuring smooth production.

This guide outlines the complex process of converting an accepted, triple-blind academic paper into the final, professional camera-ready version required by IEEE conferences (e.g., ICDM). Key steps include de-anonymizing the text by restoring author names, affiliations, and acknowledgements; compressing the content if accepted as a short paper; adhering to strict IEEE formatting and page limits; completing electronic copyright transfer (eCopyright); and registering for mandatory in-person presentation.

This guide helps authors structure lengthy academic manuscripts, ensuring the main text maintains a clear, focused narrative while relegating supportive, detailed evidence to the appendices or supplementary materials. It outlines the 'determinative' principle, advising where to place hyperparameters, extended experiments, proof details, and code links to meet high journal standards and maximize readability for reviewers.

This guide provides structured methodologies for authors to position their research within the context of existing literature and concurrent submissions at top-tier machine learning conferences (e.g., ICML, NeurIPS). It emphasizes identifying the technical delta, addressing novelty concerns, and properly citing related work to maximize acceptance chances.

This tool guides authors on the rigorous standards required for submission to IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics (TIE). It focuses on re-framing purely theoretical work into concrete, industrially relevant advances in control, power electronics, and mechatronics. It emphasizes the necessity of experimental validation, system-level industrial context, and adherence to specific journal guidelines.

A comprehensive checklist guiding authors through the final steps before submitting a manuscript to a major academic journal. It covers critical aspects such as page limits (≤50 pages), double-spacing, required submission fees, adherence to proprietary data policies, and structuring the main text versus online appendix. Use this guide to minimize submission errors and ensure a smooth submission process.