Skill UI

A comprehensive guide detailing the complex, multi-stage workflow for submitting a systems paper to a major academic conference (like ASPLOS). It maps out timelines across two submission gates, revision cycles, hardware evidence gathering (T-8 to T-2), and critical role assignments required to successfully navigate the intense academic publication process.

Use this comprehensive guide to manage the entire project lifecycle for a CAV (Computer Aided Verification) paper submission. It provides a backward-planning timeline, covering topics from initial concept fitting and evidence locking to the two-stage review process, optional artifact evaluation, and final camera-ready submission. Essential for managing technical academic deadlines and mitigating common failure modes.

This skill systematizes the entire academic publishing journey for long-form papers, specifically targeting the requirements of top-tier journals like the Chinese Journal of Computers (CJC). It maps out the complete timeline from initial topic selection, through experimentation, writing, submission, multi-stage peer review, revision, and final publication, providing critical checkpoints and best practices to ensure a systematic and successful process.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting networking research to CoNEXT. It outlines best practices for achieving technical reproducibility, focusing on pinning traces, configurations, environments, and pipelines. Learn the critical timeline for optional ACM badging and how to maintain an honest data-availability posture for robust academic review.

A comprehensive guide to managing the modern CSCW (Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work) submission timeline. It details the shift from rigid, fixed cycles to a flexible, rolling submission model, emphasizing that success relies on treating the process as a long-term 'revision campaign' rather than a quick deadline sprint. Learn how to strategically plan for revisions and maintain momentum across extended academic cycles.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide to the academic publication review process for 'Computer Science' journal. It details the single-blind review stages, from initial editorial screening to final acceptance. Users can learn key evaluation criteria, potential outcomes (acceptance, minor/major revision, rejection), expected timelines, and the specific 'leverage points' or actions authors should take at each step to manage expectations and optimize revisions.

A comprehensive model simulating the entire academic paper review cycle, specifically tailored to large-scale top-tier conferences like CVPR. It details the timeline, roles of reviewers and Area Chairs, the impact of mechanisms (like the LLM ban), and strategic advice for authors navigating the submission, rebuttal, and decision-making phases.

A comprehensive guide for managing the entire lifecycle of major academic conference submissions (e.g., CVPR). It details critical timelines, from initial scope freezing and paper drafting to supplement submission, rebuttal writing, and resubmission strategies across different venues (ICCV, ECCV). Focuses heavily on project management and coordination to prevent process failures.

This comprehensive guide provides a detailed audit checklist for submitting research manuscripts to major design automation conferences (e.g., DAC). It covers critical steps such as the two-stage abstract/manuscript timeline, adherence to the strict 6+1 page format, ensuring double-blind anonymization (removing all identifying metadata), declaring TPC conflicts, and mitigating common submission risks. Essential reading for researchers preparing for high-stakes academic submissions.

A comprehensive project management skill designed for authors preparing papers for the EACL conference. It maps out the entire single-cycle submission process, covering backward planning from the ARR deadline, rebuttal strategies, commitment decisions, and final camera-ready stages. Essential for navigating highly structured academic publication timelines and minimizing risk.

A detailed guide for modeling the complete academic peer-review lifecycle, specifically tailored to the ECCV conference structure. It covers the timeline from submission through rebuttal and AC discussion to final decision, detailing critical points such as co-author enforcement regimes, LLM policy adherence, panel reviewer composition, and strategic points influencing the final outcome. Essential for researchers targeting top-tier vision conferences.

This skill guides users through assessing the viability and timeliness of a research topic for a high-level policy journal. It evaluates whether a question meets stringent criteria—including first-order policy stakes, current global relevance, and empirical tractability—to be featured in a panel debate. It is essential for turning an academic idea into a publishable, policy-relevant narrative.