Skill UI

This skill manages the end-to-end project lifecycle for academic conference submissions, specifically tailored for major venues like ICLR. It provides a structured timeline, defining critical milestones from initial topic selection and abstract submission through paper deadlines, public discussion, and final camera-ready versions. Use it to sequence research milestones, manage evidence paths, and ensure compliance with conference rules like anonymity audits and strict deadlines.

A comprehensive guide detailing the end-to-end annual submission and presentation cycle for the IEEE ICRA conference. It covers critical milestones—from paper deadlines and video attachments to camera-ready submissions—and provides structured backward planning, fallback strategies (RA-L, IROS), and tips for navigating the academic timeline in robotics research.

A comprehensive, single-cycle master calendar and workflow guide for major academic conferences like ICSE. It details the entire ten-month journey, covering mandatory milestones from abstract submission and full paper drafting to author response, revision sprints, and final camera-ready preparation. This guide helps research teams plan backward, mitigate timeline risks, and manage complex project dependencies.

A comprehensive guide detailing the complex submission process for IEEE S&P, which operates across multiple self-contained cycles. This workflow map covers critical milestones like abstract registration, full paper submission, ethical review latency (IRB/disclosure), and planning for all three academic outcomes: Accept, Revise, or Reject. Essential for researchers managing multi-stage academic publishing timelines.

Provides a comprehensive framework for generating structured, blameless post-mortem documents after a production outage or service degradation. It guides teams through reconstructing timelines, identifying root causes using methods like 5 Whys, quantifying impact, and generating concrete, actionable preventative measures to improve system resilience.

A comprehensive project management guide for navigating the IEEE INFOCOM conference submission cycle. This skill outlines every critical milestone, from initial topic selection and abstract registration through full-paper submission, camera-ready preparation, and final presentation. It emphasizes backward planning around the single annual summer deadline and highlights key risk areas for success.

A comprehensive project management guide detailing the entire lifecycle of a high-stakes sensing systems research submission. It provides a detailed backward planning timeline, covering critical milestones from initial venue and track selection, hardware freezing, field deployment logistics, double-blind review, and final submission to major conferences like SenSys. It emphasizes managing the critical path of field work and data artifacts.

Use this skill to manage the end-to-end timeline for an IROS paper submission. It provides a comprehensive backward-planning workflow covering milestones like evidence lock, paper deadlines, video attachments, and camera-ready preparation, ensuring the project stays on track for the fall IEEE/RSJ conference.

A comprehensive guide for planning and executing a scientific paper submission for the ISSTA conference. It maps out all critical milestones, including venue fit, evidence locking, submission deadlines, major revisions, and artifact evaluation. The skill provides backward planning heuristics and identifies common failure modes to ensure timely and successful publication.

This guide details the highly selective, multi-stage review process for a prestigious academic journal. It covers editorial pre-screening, double-blind peer review, expected timelines, and common pitfalls. Use this resource to stress-test your manuscript, understand field significance, and set realistic expectations before submitting your work.

This comprehensive guide outlines the entire peer-review pipeline for the Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics (JCAD&CG). It details every stage, from initial editor screening and double-blind expert review, through major/minor revisions, to final acceptance. It helps authors understand their current status, expected next steps, and how to manage the academic submission timeline effectively.

A comprehensive guide to understanding the Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) peer review process. This resource helps authors interpret editor decisions (desk-reject, major revision, etc.), sets realistic expectations for the revision timeline, and guides the development of a robust revision strategy, including when new studies are necessary.