Skill UI

A comprehensive pre-submission strategy tool designed for authors submitting to top macroeconomics journals, such as AEJ: Macro. It helps authors anticipate and structure defenses against predictable, highly technical objections (e.g., identification flaws, robustness gaps, lack of breadth) raised by expert referees and co-editors. Use this guide to assess desk-reject risk, plan necessary robustness checks, and pre-emptively strengthen the manuscript before formal submission.

This skill is a comprehensive tool designed to help authors evaluate the suitability of their economics manuscript for AER: Insights. It guides users through assessing key criteria such as the general interest of a single result, the required conciseness, methodological strength, and adherence to the journal's specific short-format house style and submission guidelines. Use it for venue selection and manuscript re-framing.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for academic manuscripts intended for the American Educational Research Journal (AERJ). It guides users through the entire writing lifecycle, determining the correct next step based on the current development stage and the paper's dominant education-research lens (e.g., policy, teaching, development). It is designed to ensure the contribution is pitched to the whole field, not just a subfield.

A specialized tool for polishing pure mathematics manuscripts, designed to enhance the rigor and overall flow of academic writing. It guides authors to eliminate soft language (e.g., "clearly," "obviously"), ensure precise quantification, explicitly state constant dependencies, and structure hypotheses meticulously. Ideal for late-stage proof refinement before journal submission.

A comprehensive guide for researchers and reviewers designing or auditing Automated Software Engineering (ASE) evaluations. It outlines the necessary rigor, including the use of real subject systems, establishing fair and runnable tool baselines, performing targeted ablations (especially for LLMs), defining explicit oracles, and ensuring full data and model provenance to guarantee reproducible and scientifically sound results.

This comprehensive guide is designed for authors targeting Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A). It details the journal's specific scope, required scientific rigor, and submission guidelines. Use this tool to assess if your manuscript fits A&A, refine your research framing, and ensure strict compliance with data reduction, uncertainty reporting, and archival standards.

This comprehensive guide helps authors assess the suitability of their manuscript for the Biomaterials journal. It emphasizes the journal's core requirement: dual rigor. A successful submission must integrate thorough materials design and characterization with genuine biological evaluation (in vitro/in vivo), crucially establishing a mechanistic link between material properties and biological outcomes. Use this tool for venue selection, manuscript re-framing, and pre-submission self-assessment against high academic standards.

This sophisticated tool is designed to polish scientific manuscripts for high-impact, rigorous journals. It guides users in structuring a mechanistic narrative, ensuring that every claim made in the text is precisely calibrated to the strength of the supporting experimental evidence (e.g., distinguishing correlation from necessity). It focuses on scientific storytelling, nomenclature consistency, and eliminating hype, transforming raw research data into a polished, scholarly article.

A specialized tool designed to assess the suitability of academic manuscripts for top-tier economic journals, such as China Economic Quarterly (CEQ). It utilizes a three-dimensional diagnostic framework (Identification, Communicability, Problem Level) to determine if the research meets international academic standards. If the fit is weak, it provides strategic guidance on re-routing the paper to more appropriate specialized journals (e.g., Financial Research, World Economy).

A comprehensive guide designed to help researchers evaluate the suitability of their manuscript for 'China Rural Survey.' It covers the journal's academic scope, key thematic interests (e.g., land tenure, rural governance), required structural elements, and critical submission protocols (such as double-blind review, data/code public disclosure, and abstract formatting). Use this tool to refine your argument and ensure compliance before formal submission.

This tool serves as an orchestrator for authors preparing submissions to Cognitive Psychology (Elsevier). It guides users through the entire research lifecycle—from initial topic selection and theoretical formalization to study design, data analysis, and open science practices. It emphasizes structuring the contribution as a model-driven, multi-experiment program, ensuring all necessary steps, including code transparency, are addressed.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for academic manuscripts submitted to Conservation Biology. It guides authors through the entire scientific writing lifecycle, helping them determine the appropriate article type (e.g., Review, Essay, Contributed Paper) and the necessary sequence of sub-skills (from study design to data analysis and relevance checks). It ensures the final work has direct, transferable implications for the conservation of biological diversity.