Skill UI

A comprehensive skill designed for authors targeting Science Signaling, a leading journal in cellular signal transduction. This tool provides guidance on the journal's scope, required mechanistic depth, quantitative rigor, house style, and specific evidence standards (e.g., loss/gain-of-function, in vivo evidence). It is crucial for venue selection and restructuring manuscripts to fit the high standards of AAAS Science family publications.

This skill is designed to help researchers assess the suitability and structure of their academic manuscripts for the journal 'Scientific Management Research.' It analyzes the alignment of the topic with core areas like innovation policy, technology management, and regional science. Users can utilize it to understand journal requirements, identify common rejection pitfalls, and receive suggestions for improving the narrative and scope before submission.

This specialized tool analyzes Git diffs against a stated development intent to detect scope creep. It identifies overly broad pull requests, unrelated files, dependency additions, public API renames, or configuration changes. It guides users on whether changes should be kept, split into separate commits, or if the connection requires explicit justification, ensuring clean and focused code merges.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for academic manuscripts targeting general social-science journals. It guides authors through the entire writing and revision lifecycle, ensuring the paper maintains a general audience focus and adheres to strict structural constraints, such as 10,000-word limits (including references) and 10 figure/table panels. It routes the user to the most necessary next skill, whether for initial topic selection, theoretical positioning, research design, or final rebuttal.

A comprehensive audit tool for stress-testing the logical coherence of sociological theory manuscripts. This skill guides the user through checking every link in the theoretical spine (premises → mechanism → propositions → conclusion), ensuring that claims are warranted, identifying strongest rival explanations, and handling potential counter-cases. It strengthens the argument itself, independent of empirical data.

This skill is designed to help researchers critically assess whether their project aligns with the scope of Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ). It guides users to pressure-test the core contribution: the link between social structure, process, and the individual. It helps frame the research question, determine the appropriate tradition (e.g., identity theory, symbolic interaction), and decide whether the final output should be a full Article or a focused Note.

This tool acts as an orchestrator for Social Psychology Quarterly (SPQ) submissions, guiding authors through the entire manuscript lifecycle. It routes the user based on the research stage, the sociological tradition (e.g., symbolic interaction, social structure), and the article type (Article vs. Note). Its core function is ensuring the paper maintains the critical link between the individual and society, directing the user to the appropriate specialized skill for design, theory, data, and writing.

This tool guides the transformation of academic manuscripts, particularly in the social sciences, from a policy-report or work-summary tone into a rigorous scholarly argument. It helps users replace vague slogans and empty claims with concrete theoretical mechanisms, ensuring the writing maintains a scholarly, restrained, and macro-perspective, and that every paragraph centers on a discernible core proposition.

This comprehensive preflight checklist guides authors through the final stages of academic manuscript preparation before submission. It covers critical areas including adherence to specific journal formatting (e.g., page-bottom footnotes), structural integrity, ethical compliance (anonymity), and content coherence. Use this tool to ensure your manuscript meets all current guidelines and minimizes rejection risks.

This comprehensive guide outlines best practices for designing and auditing empirical evaluations of formal verification tools and algorithms. It stresses the use of shared, community-accepted benchmarks, ensuring fair comparison against the strongest baselines with equal resources, meticulous reporting of all metrics, validating results for soundness, and guaranteeing full reproducibility on clean virtual environments.

A comprehensive pre-submission checklist for authors preparing papers for TACAS/ETAPS. It guides users through selecting the correct paper category (research, tool, case-study), adhering to specific Springer LNCS page limits, managing double-blind vs. single-blind review rules, and correctly staging mandatory tool artifacts to ensure acceptance readiness.

A comprehensive methodological guide for designing rigorous academic studies in accounting. It details advanced econometric techniques—including Difference-in-Differences (DiD), Instrumental Variables (IV), Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD), and experimental setups—to establish credible causal identification. Use this guide when your research challenge is solving endogeneity or isolating a specific economic channel from complex, non-random variables.