Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting the International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP). It assists in positioning the manuscript, re-framing the contribution, and verifying the evidence bar. The tool emphasizes that the work must focus on knowledge acquisition, engineering, and operationalizing structured knowledge systems, rather than merely using them in a general context.

A comprehensive strategic guide for authors targeting the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). It assists in assessing manuscript fit, refining the narrative, and strengthening empirical evidence (e.g., benchmarks, tools, artifacts) to meet the rigorous standards of top-tier SE conferences. Use this to re-frame scholarly work from journal or arXiv styles into a selective conference narrative.

This skill provides a comprehensive guide for authors determining the fit of their empirical software engineering (SE) manuscript for the International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM). It helps authors rigorously check the study design, evidence bar, proper framing, and necessary re-framing required to transform a journal or arXiv-style paper into a high-quality conference submission suitable for ESEM reviewers. It focuses on measurement validity, experimental rigor, and evidence synthesis.

Provides a detailed and rigorous workflow guide for managing a full academic conference submission cycle (e.g., ISCA). It advises researchers on working backward from critical deadlines—from topic selection and baseline freezing to abstract writing, paper submission, handling reviews, and generating camera-ready artifacts—treating the academic process like a structured engineering schedule.

This guide provides comprehensive guidelines for designing, conducting, and auditing empirical studies in software engineering. It emphasizes achieving scientific rigor by matching every claim to specific, measured evidence, ensuring fair baselining (equal budget), and applying appropriate advanced statistics (non-parametric tests, effect sizes). Essential reading for researchers submitting papers based on performance evaluations.

This guide helps researchers determine the optimal conference or journal venue for their software engineering contribution. It specifically addresses whether the core of the work is a testing or analysis technique evaluated on real subjects (ISSTA), or if it fits better within broader Software Engineering (ICSE/FSE), formal verification (PLDI/CAV), or applied domains.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for building verifiable reproducibility evidence for academic manuscripts. It instructs authors on critical engineering disciplines, including freezing environment dependencies, controlling random seeds, versioning datasets and models, and creating anonymous, self-contained running materials that stand up to rigorous external peer review.

A detailed guide for structuring the 'Related Work' section of high-level academic manuscripts in communications engineering. It teaches authors to move beyond simple literature listing by focusing on the 'delta'—defining the gaps in existing research and clearly positioning the paper's unique contribution to ensure novelty and academic rigor for top-tier journals.

A comprehensive guide for researchers to determine if their work aligns with the scope of the Journal of Software (JOS). It provides crucial criteria for distinguishing JOS from other major computer science publications, assisting in article type selection, and identifying potential revision signals to ensure strong software engineering focus.

This guide provides a comprehensive checklist for writing and refining technical papers for the Journal of Software (JOS). It covers structuring the abstract, mastering the introduction narrative arc, ensuring terminology consistency, and adhering to strict citation standards (GB/T 7714). Use this when submitting a draft to a Chinese academic journal, aiming to transform the manuscript into a highly polished, professional piece that meets the rigorous standards of the Chinese software engineering community.

A specialized tool designed to assess the suitability and refine the structure of a manuscript targeting the Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IJEM). It helps authors understand the journal's specific scope, preferred methodologies (modeling, algorithms, simulation), structural requirements, and common rejection pitfalls, optimizing the paper before submission.

A comprehensive guide and tool for assessing manuscript fit for the Chinese academic journal, *Management Science* (published by HIT). It helps researchers determine if their work meets the journal's requirements, especially regarding quantitative methods, model setting, structured argument, and adherence to specific word count and formatting rules. It assists in optimizing the narrative for high-level management and engineering science publications.