Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors writing the Related Work section for high-impact journals (e.g., Acta Electronica Sinica). It teaches how to structure the review critically, moving beyond mere chronology to organize by technical path, defining scope, articulating clear technical deficiencies, and precisely positioning the paper's novelty against state-of-the-art methods.

This guide helps pure-mathematics researchers precisely state and frame the main theorems of their manuscripts for submission to top-tier journals. It emphasizes techniques for quantifying novelty, separating the core headline result from corollaries, and rigorously positioning the work relative to the existing state of the art, mimicking the structure of Annals of Mathematics submissions.

A specialized tool for polishing pure mathematics manuscripts, designed to enhance the rigor and overall flow of academic writing. It guides authors to eliminate soft language (e.g., "clearly," "obviously"), ensure precise quantification, explicitly state constant dependencies, and structure hypotheses meticulously. Ideal for late-stage proof refinement before journal submission.

A comprehensive checklist for the final preflight checks of the Annual Review of Sociology (ARSoc) article. This guide ensures compliance with publisher requirements, covering disclosure statements, reference formatting, figure permissions, and critical transparency obligations for coverage accounts and meta-analyses. It serves as the last quality gate before final submission.

This skill guides the transformation of visual observations and documentary evidence into a sustained, contestable academic thesis, suitable for high-level scholarly publication. It teaches how to explicitly state a claim (the thesis), define its scholarly stakes, and rigorously warrant every interpretive leap using evidence chains and anticipating counter-readings. Use this when a draft is descriptive but lacks a clear, disputed argument.

This guide details the mandatory steps for preparing the final, camera-ready version of an ASE conference paper. It covers systematic de-anonymization (restoring real author details, tools, and grants), utilizing the extra content page for incorporating review feedback, finalizing permanent DOI-archived data availability statements, and ensuring strict adherence to mandated dual IEEE/ACM templates and metadata requirements.

A comprehensive guide for researchers submitting to ASE (Automated Software Engineering). It details mandatory requirements for ensuring research reproducibility, covering the Data Availability Statement, providing anonymized and runnable tools, pinning system provenance (commits, versions, SHAs), and managing cached LLM outputs. Essential for passing rigorous peer review.

A comprehensive audit guide for submitting research papers to IEEE/ACM ASE conferences. It covers strict formatting rules (acmart template, page budget), mandatory Data Availability Statements, double-anonymous review compliance, and critical submission pitfalls like identity leaks and template errors. Use this checklist before uploading to HotCRP to maximize acceptance chances.

This guide provides expert principles for designing and auditing system-level experiments in computer architecture (e.g., for ASPLOS-level conferences). It details the proper usage of various instruments—from real silicon and FPGAs to cycle-level simulators and analytical models—ensuring that every claim is matched to a valid, stated error model. It emphasizes workload selection, establishing strong baselines, performing rigorous ablation studies, and honestly reporting measurement noise and limitations to maintain scientific credibility.

This guide details best practices for ensuring scientific rigor and reproducibility in complex system research. It outlines the necessity of capturing the full execution state—including hardware steppings, BIOS revisions, kernel configurations, toolchain versions, and dataset provenance—to prevent data decay and validate findings against environmental drift.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing replication and transparency packages for submissions to the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS). It outlines requirements for depositing quantitative and qualitative data and code into the BJPolS Dataverse, ensuring that research findings are fully reproducible and adhering to the Data Access and Research Transparency (DA-RT) statement.

A comprehensive checklist detailing all mandatory requirements for submitting academic manuscripts (e.g., Contemporary Accounting Research). It verifies compliance on key areas including length limits, abstract word count, separated title pages, blind manuscripts, ethics approval (IRB/REB), data integrity statements, and correct payment proof. Use this before the final upload to ensure maximum readiness and avoid editorial rejection.