Skill UI

A comprehensive tool for authors targeting the ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security (ASIACCS). It provides expert guidance on assessing whether a computer and communications security manuscript is a strong fit for this specific, high-impact venue. Topics covered include conference fit assessment, evidence bar establishment, manuscript re-framing strategies, threat modeling, and proper community positioning for maximum review impact.

This guide helps researchers strategically position their manuscripts for top-tier venues like ACM DIS. It provides deep insight into the required scope, contribution types (e.g., design artifacts, methods, theory), evidence standards (e.g., controlled study, field deployment), and necessary framing adjustments to ensure the work aligns perfectly with the conference's community expectations. Use this tool for venue selection, manuscript re-framing, and submission strategy.

This guide provides authors with a comprehensive framework for positioning technical manuscripts for the ACM Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (ISS) conference. It covers essential areas like defining scope, aligning hardware evidence with interaction techniques, optimizing the narrative structure, and understanding the specific community expectations for spatial and tangible computing.

A comprehensive guide for authors targeting ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS). This skill helps determine manuscript fit, provides strategies for re-framing work from other disciplines (e.g., journal or arXiv style), and details the required evidence (e.g., community-grounded framing, ethical evaluation) needed to succeed in this specialized venue. Use it for venue selection, scope calibration, and submission readiness checks for accessible technology research.

This skill serves as a comprehensive guide for authors submitting manuscripts to highly selective pure mathematics journals like Acta Mathematica. It assesses the work's significance, intellectual fit, required level of rigor, structural integrity, and adherence to top-tier academic standards, ensuring the research is ready for the global mathematical research community.

This guide outlines the process for converting accepted academic research tools and data into highly polished, reproducible, and reusable packages for the ASE Artifact Evaluation track. Learn how to meet the criteria for earning 'Artifacts Available' (DOI archiving) and 'Artifacts Reusable' badges, ensuring your work is durable and accessible to the wider research community.

This skill helps researchers determine if their scientific contribution—whether it is primary research, a major synthesis, a field-campaign overview, or a community essay—is best suited for the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (BAMS). It guides the author on the specific scope, required level of synthesis, and community significance expected by BAMS, helping to re-frame narrow technical results for a broad, interdisciplinary audience across atmospheric, oceanic, and hydrologic sciences.

A comprehensive guide detailing best practices for achieving research transparency and reproducibility, especially for HCI and related scientific studies. It outlines three critical layers of documentation—Protocol, Analysis, and Data—to ensure that studies can be reliably verified and built upon by the academic community.

This guide helps researchers assess if their work correctly spans the tri-community area of Information Retrieval, Data Mining, and Knowledge Management. It provides a detailed framework for comparing CIKM against major academic venues like SIGIR, KDD, WSDM, and SIGMOD/VLDB, ensuring the paper's scope is optimally matched to the target conference.

This guide helps researchers determine the most appropriate top-tier academic conference (e.g., CoNEXT, SIGCOMM, NSDI, IMC) and submission cycle for their networking research. It provides detailed criteria, routing tables, and tests (e.g., platform-realism test, model-swap test) to ensure the contribution is evaluated on a real target and fits the target community's scope and rigor.

A comprehensive strategic guide for authors targeting the Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum (CLEF). It helps frame IR/NLP research by defining the appropriate contribution type, evidence bar, and rigorous evaluation methods required for top-tier academic submission, ensuring the paper aligns with the venue's specific community expectations.

This comprehensive guide outlines best practices for packaging and releasing scientific artifacts—including code, training configurations, demonstration data, and policy checkpoints—for robotics research papers. It details how to prepare materials for anonymous reviewer assessment and for durable public release, ensuring the work is fully reproducible by the academic community.