Skill UI

This guide provides a rigorous framework for defending causal identification claims in empirical microeconomics, tailored for top-tier journals like AEJ: Applied. It covers modern techniques and anti-patterns for RCTs, Difference-in-Differences (DiD), Regression Discontinuity (RDD), and Instrumental Variables (IV), ensuring the mapping from variation to the causal estimand is explicit, defensible, and falsifiable.

This guide details how to construct a sophisticated and rigorous robustness suite for top-tier academic econometrics journals (e.g., AEJ: Applied). It moves beyond simple regression tables, providing targeted checks against common methodological threats such as omitted variables, specification search, functional form choices, and incorrect statistical inference. The goal is to systematically demonstrate that the main point estimate is stable, reliable, and not an artifact of the research design.

This guide outlines the rigorous methodological standards for empirical identification in macroeconomics, crucial for submitting to top-tier journals. It covers advanced techniques such as Structural VAR (SVAR), Local Projections (LP), and handling high-frequency/micro-data shocks. It ensures authors explicitly defend the mapping from raw data to dynamic causal objects, addressing critical issues like endogeneity, anticipation, and structural breaks, and providing execution checklists for modern econometric tools (DiD, IV, RDD).

A comprehensive framework designed to rigorously test the stability of key macroeconomic findings. This program addresses potential biases arising from specification choices, sample periods (e.g., Great Moderation, ZLB, COVID breaks), and methodological variations (SVAR vs. LP). It ensures that the reported headline quantity remains robust even when challenged by a skeptical academic referee, providing a targeted defense rather than simply listing extra tables. Ideal for high-stakes empirical macro papers.

This skill acts as a comprehensive workflow router for manuscripts targeting the American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro). It guides the researcher through the entire publication lifecycle—from initial topic selection and literature positioning, through rigorous quantitative modeling (DSGE, SVAR), empirical identification, writing, to final submission and rebuttal strategy. It ensures the final paper meets the high standards of modern macroeconomics research.

This guide provides stringent methodological standards for establishing credible causal claims in empirical policy manuscripts. It covers advanced econometric techniques—including Difference-in-Differences (DiD), Instrumental Variables (IV), Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD), and Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT)—required to move beyond mere correlation and prove that the observed effect is genuinely caused by the policy intervention.

This guide provides rigorous methodological guidelines for ensuring the identification strategy in high-impact empirical economics papers (AER: Insights). It covers key areas including Difference-in-Differences (DiD), Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD), Instrumental Variables (IV), and structural parameter identification. It emphasizes the need for extreme methodological clarity, transparency, and conciseness required for top-tier academic publication.

A comprehensive guide for strengthening the methodological rigor of academic manuscripts, particularly for high-stakes journals. It covers advanced techniques for causal identification (e.g., Difference-in-Differences, Instrumental Variables, Regression Discontinuity), pre-analysis planning, linking theory to empirical tests, and defending claims against skeptical reviewers. This skill focuses on methodological architecture, not code.

A comprehensive guide for strengthening and defending the methodological rigor of academic manuscripts across various anthropological subfields (ethnography, archaeology, biological, etc.). It instructs users on how to justify sampling, interpretative leaps, ethical considerations, and how to preemptively address rival readings and potential disconfirmations, ensuring the argument is robustly connected to evidence.

This guide helps researchers structure their discussion section and manuscript to explicitly articulate the theoretical contribution, moving beyond simple results reporting. It teaches how to identify, claim, and frame various types of theoretical advancements (e.g., new mechanisms, boundaries, or integrating literatures), ensuring the paper meets the high standards of top-tier academic journals like AMJ.

This guide provides comprehensive methodological blueprints for designing scholarly manuscripts submitted to Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS). It covers various research paradigms, including qualitative field studies, behavioral experiments, surveys, and historical/archival inquiries. Emphasis is placed on rigorous planning, ethical considerations (IRB approval, consent, anonymity), and maintaining theoretical alignment between the research design and the core argument, helping researchers avoid methodological pitfalls.

This guide provides a comprehensive deep dive into the rigorous academic review process of the American Political Science Review (APSR). It details the mechanics of double-anonymous review, the three primary grounds for desk-rejection (remit, ethics, substance), and the strategic implications of various decision categories. It is essential for authors to pre-empt failure modes and structure their work for maximum acceptance chances before submission.