Skill UI

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for authors responding to major journal revisions. It teaches how to structure a technical, point-by-point rebuttal, systematically closing proof gaps, strengthening assumptions, incorporating missing baselines, and preparing the entire codebase and data for professional reproducibility review.

This guide provides comprehensive steps for preparing a camera-ready version of an accepted academic conference paper, such as those for the PACMMOD PODS track. It covers essential tasks including complete de-anonymization, applying final journal formatting, integrating required revisions, populating detailed metadata (ORCID, DOI, CCS concepts), and ensuring the full version is correctly posted and cross-linked on arXiv.

A comprehensive guide for authors handling the conditional acceptance stage of POPL. It details the two-gate process: first, satisfying the mandatory committee revisions, and second, de-anonymizing and formatting the paper for the official PACMPL journal issue. Covers metadata management, ORCIDs, open access rights, and logistical planning for the final conference talk.

This guide provides authors with best practices for structuring scientific papers, specifically focusing on the division of content between the main body (The Letter) and the Supplemental Material (SM). It emphasizes the 'stand-alone' rule, ensuring the core argument remains fully understandable without consulting the SM, while effectively organizing detailed derivations, extended datasets, and secondary controls in the appendix.

Guides authors through the rigorous, end-to-end lifecycle of submitting a paper to the Review of Economic Dynamics (RED). It acts as an orchestration checklist, covering critical stages from initial scope definition and quantitative modeling to data archiving, manuscript formatting, fee payment, and handling revisions. It ensures authors maintain methodological rigor and code-first discipline throughout the entire academic publishing process.

This router guides the entire lifecycle of scholarly reviews, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and critical integrative syntheses. It maps out the necessary steps—from question scoping and protocol registration (PRISMA) through systematic searching, framework building, data coding, and final submission/revision—ensuring methodological rigor for high-impact academic journals.

This comprehensive guide details the strategy for drafting a compelling rebuttal letter and revision plan following rigorous peer review (R&R). It teaches authors how to structure point-by-point responses, differentiate between major concerns and suggestions, adhere to strict journal constraints (e.g., page caps, data consistency), and ensure all revisions are presented with verifiable evidence.

A comprehensive, final preflight checklist designed for submitting scientific manuscripts to top-tier journals. It ensures every critical element—from statistical rigor, data availability, and ethical compliance to formatting, figures, and references—is fully resolved, preventing editorial rejection or major revisions upon initial submission.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing a SIGGRAPH paper for final publication in ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG). It details the rigorous requirements beyond simple revisions, covering essential journal metadata (DOI, ACM rights, CCS concepts), correct formatting, permanent archiving of code/data, and finalizing supplemental media for professional publication.

A comprehensive guide detailing how to manage the division of content between the core 7-page paper body and the supplemental materials package for SIGGRAPH submissions. It emphasizes treating the results video as primary evidence, providing best practices for video creation, comparison galleries, and organizing additional technical evidence (code, data, proofs).

A comprehensive guide detailing the mandatory steps for converting an accepted, double-anonymous conference paper into a final, journal-ready (camera-ready) version for academic publication. This process covers de-anonymization, completing journal metadata (DOI, ORCID, CCS), incorporating shepherd-required revisions, and ensuring permanent reproducibility.

This guide provides an in-depth breakdown of the academic research paper review cycle, using top-tier database conferences (like SIGMOD) as a case study. It covers the double-anonymous review process, the author feedback phase, interpreting the Accept/Reject/Revise verdicts, and navigating the post-decision revision window and embargo rules. Essential knowledge for authors preparing submissions to top-tier conference proceedings.