Skill UI

A comprehensive preflight checklist designed for submitting manuscripts to academic journals (e.g., Human Relations). It guides authors through critical pre-submission requirements, ensuring compliance with double-anonymity, strict word limits, SAGE Harvard citation style, structured abstracts, and mandatory declarations (AI use and data transparency). Use this tool to validate your manuscript before submission and minimize desk rejections.

This guide helps structure, audit, and refine the exhibits (tables and figures) for academic manuscripts, particularly in Human Relations. It ensures that the inference path from raw data to theoretical claims is visible. It covers best practices for both qualitative exhibits (data-structure models, evidence tables) and quantitative exhibits (regression models, interaction plots), while adhering to submission constraints like anonymization and word limits.

This skill polishes scholarly prose for academic manuscripts, particularly in Human Relations and social science. It focuses on elevating the writing from technically correct but flat drafts to a theoretically engaged, highly readable, and narratively compelling register. It guides users on structuring the argument (puzzle to generativity), refining prose (cutting nominalizations, using process voice), and adhering to strict academic constraints (abstract length, word caps, anonymity).

A comprehensive guide for crafting academic rebuttals in response to peer reviews (e.g., ICALP). It teaches authors how to strategically address correctness doubts, correct factual misreadings, provide necessary clarifications, and honestly concede genuine gaps, all while adhering to strict double-blind rules and limited word counts. The focus is strictly on technical precision, helping authors improve their paper's acceptance chances.

This comprehensive guide details the stringent process of preparing an accepted scholarly paper for publication in LIPIcs proceedings. It covers mandatory steps including converting to the specific `lipics-v2021` class, systematic de-anonymization (restoring authors, ORCIDs, and acknowledgements), completing rich metadata (ACM CCS, keywords, funding), and reconciling the final body text with the public full version. Essential reading for ensuring smooth production.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing conference camera-ready papers for major academic proceedings (e.g., LIPIcs/ICDT). It systematically details the necessary steps to de-anonymize the work, populate mandatory metadata (ORCIDs, ACM CCS concepts, Keywords), adhere to strict LaTeX formatting, and ensure all assets meet CC-BY licensing requirements for successful DOI minting.

This guide provides detailed standards for structuring and writing manuscripts submitted to the INFORMS Journal on Computing (IJOC). It mandates a precise, methods-forward, and quantitative voice, ensuring the paper is accessible to both Operations Research (OR) and Computer Science (CS) audiences. Key elements covered include abstract structure (≤300 words, no formulas), rapid contribution framing in the introduction, and using numbered pseudocode for methods.

A comprehensive guide for the final pre-submission quality check of academic manuscripts, particularly for double-blind review processes. It covers critical compliance points such as maintaining anonymity, adhering to strict word counts (including figures/tables), managing separate metadata (abstracts, acknowledgments), and ensuring proper third-person self-citation to avoid common rejection pitfalls.

A guide for designing and structuring empirical tables and figures for submissions to International Organizations (IOs). Focuses on meeting strict word limits, ensuring exhibits are self-contained, reproducible, and clearly separating core arguments (main text) from supporting details (supplementary material). Best practices include explicit unit labeling, prioritizing effect plots over dense tables, and guaranteeing that all displayed numbers match the original analysis code.

A comprehensive guide for polishing and structuring International Relations manuscripts for submission to major International Organizations (IO) journals. It ensures the paper meets rigorous academic standards: framing a generalizable theoretical contribution, adhering to strict word caps (e.g., 14,000 words), and following double-blind formatting conventions (like third-person citation and separate abstract/word count).

This guide helps authors structure and articulate the novel, rigorous contribution of their work specifically for Information Systems Research (ISR) journals. It addresses the mandatory ~500-word contribution statement required in cover letters, ensuring the paper clearly advances an IS conversation, centers the IT artifact, and matches the required academic genre (insight, mechanism, or artifact).

This comprehensive guide details the rigorous process of transforming a submitted ITCS paper into the final, open-access LIPIcs camera-ready version. It covers critical steps including switching to the required `lipics-v2021` LaTeX class, fully re-attributing author identity (names, ORCIDs, funding), completing structured metadata (ACM CCS, keywords), incorporating reviewer-suggested fixes, and ensuring compliance with strict production standards set by the Dagstuhl editorial office.