Skill UI

This orchestrator guides writers through the entire process of developing academic philosophical articles. It acts as a sophisticated router, prioritizing the establishment of a sharp thesis and a sound argument before content polishing. By analyzing the submission stage and content type (e.g., Article, Book Review, Discussion), it maps out the optimal writing path, ensuring structural integrity and argumentative depth for academic publishing.

This guide provides comprehensive advice for positioning computer science manuscripts, particularly those involving software repository mining, developer behavior, and empirical methods, for the Mining Software Repositories (MSR) conference. It covers required elements like dataset construction, validity threat analysis, reproducible workflows, and aligning the work with the specific scope of software analytics venues, helping authors strategically re-frame their research for maximum impact.

A comprehensive preflight checklist for submitting manuscripts to high-tier academic journals. It verifies workflow compliance (e.g., ScholarOne), double-anonymity, adherence to strict page limits, preparation of the transparency commitment, and proper formatting (APA 7th). This guide ensures authors are fully prepared for the rigorous academic submission process.

This workflow serves as a comprehensive router for authors preparing manuscripts for the MIS Quarterly (MISQ). It guides researchers through the entire academic writing lifecycle, ensuring systematic development from initial topic selection and identifying the core IS research tradition (behavioral, design science, economics, or organizational). It maps out the necessary sequence of steps, including theory development, literature positioning, methodology, data analysis, contribution framing, and final submission readiness.

This guide serves as a comprehensive workflow router for authors preparing a Marketing Science manuscript. It dictates the sequential steps, from identifying a modeling-worthy topic and developing a structural or analytical model, through data analysis, contribution framing, and final submission. It ensures the paper maintains a focus on formal modeling and managerial counterfactuals, adhering to the journal's rigorous standards.

A comprehensive guide to modeling the specific peer review cycle of MLSys submissions. It details the OpenReview workflow, the challenges posed by the mixed ML and systems reviewer pool, and provides strategic advice on addressing concerns related to workload representativeness, baseline strength, and evidence scope matching for high-stakes technical papers.

A comprehensive project management guide for the MLSys conference submission cycle. It covers the entire research lifecycle, from initial venue selection and track choice through paper submission, review responses, artifact evaluation, and final conference presentation. The guide emphasizes backward planning, managing critical resources like shared GPU time, and mitigating common failure modes.

This guide helps authors navigate the complex, multi-stage submission process for MobiCom. It emphasizes planning backward from the final paper cutoff, accounting for two distinct annual rounds, staggered review stages, and the critical impact of schedule slips on program editions. Essential for managing wireless and mobility research timelines.

A comprehensive guide for submitting research artifacts to the MobiSys Artifact Evaluation Committee (AEC). It details the process for achieving three independent ACM badges (Available, Functional, Results Reproduced). Emphasis is placed on creating fully reproducible, script-first workflows, designing for hardware-optional environments, and maintaining strict anonymity during review.

This guide provides a comprehensive project management workflow for academic submissions to the MobiSys conference. It outlines the critical path, from initial system design and on-device measurement to final paper submission and artifact preparation. The workflow helps users plan backward from the single, crucial December deadline, managing device experiment lead time and mitigating common academic failure modes.

This guide functions as a sophisticated workflow router for authors targeting submission to Molecular Cell. It diagnoses the current stage of a manuscript (e.g., missing data, weak mechanism, need for rebuttal) and recommends the precise next specialized skill needed to address bottlenecks. It ensures the manuscript meets the high bar of mechanistic depth and orthogonal validation required by top-tier molecular biology journals.

A comprehensive workflow guide for authors facing Major/Minor Revisions (R&R) in academic journals. It details systematic steps for prioritizing feedback, particularly from Department and Associate Editors, strengthening empirical or analytical evidence, adhering to page constraints, and structuring a precise, point-by-point rebuttal letter while maintaining operational centrality.