Skill UI

A comprehensive guide for authors addressing the rebuttal window for major NLP/AI conferences (like EACL). It details how to strategically triage reviewer objections, craft responses for both individual reviewers and the action editor's meta-review, plan runnable in-window experiments, and make critical decisions about the paper's future venue.

This comprehensive guide outlines the critical steps required to prepare a camera-ready version of an NLP conference paper (e.g., EACL). It covers mandatory submissions after acceptance, including content expansion, de-anonymization (restoring author names, citations, and metadata), addressing meta-review required changes, ensuring correct ACL Anthology metadata, and managing public artifact release and presentation logistics. Essential for ensuring academic integrity and compliance.

This guide provides expert strategies for crafting the 'Related Work' section in NLP research papers, ensuring it moves beyond a simple literature list. It emphasizes structuring the section as a contrastive argument that clearly positions the contribution, addresses citation specifics (e.g., ACL Anthology vs. arXiv), acknowledges concurrent work, and ensures coverage of diverse and recent venues like LREC-COLING and TACL.

This guide provides comprehensive instructions for preparing and submitting supplementary material for computer vision conferences like ECCV. It details how the supplement should support the main paper's claims without adding new results, covering topics such as qualitative result visualization, detailed ablation studies, code archive scrubbing, and ensuring full anonymity across all uploaded assets.

This guide outlines the complete project management workflow for major computer vision conferences like ECCV, CVPR, and ICCV. It covers the entire academic cycle, from initial registration and submission through peer review, acceptance, camera-readiness, and post-conference retargeting strategies. Useful for research teams planning multiple submissions across even and odd years.

A comprehensive guide for researchers structuring empirical papers for top-tier economics journals. It covers advanced quasi-experimental techniques (DID, IV, RDD) and structural estimation, emphasizing that successful submissions require not only statistically credible identification but also broad, defensible economic meaning and general relevance. Includes detailed checklists for robustness checks and diagnostic steps.

This comprehensive guide structures the process for authors responding to reviewers' reports (R&R) from top-tier academic journals. It provides a step-by-step plan for drafting the response letter, ensuring a respectful, evidence-based tone, and systematically addressing all major concerns regarding economic mechanism, identification, and broad relevance. It emphasizes strategic negotiation and structural rigor.

A comprehensive guide for empirical economists on building a robust argument beyond simple statistical significance. It details how to address alternative economic explanations, test for specification fragility, and establish external validity, helping manuscripts survive demanding academic referee scrutiny.

This skill is a comprehensive guide designed to help authors position their academic manuscripts for submission to top-tier journals, specifically focusing on the standards of *Economic Science*. It provides detailed advice on article structure, necessary econometric methodologies (e.g., DID, IV, RDD), core academic contribution points, and common pitfalls to avoid, ensuring manuscripts meet the high standards of academic rigor and relevance.

A comprehensive guide detailing advanced econometric methods for establishing causal relationships in policy evaluations. It covers techniques such as Difference-in-Differences (DID), Instrumental Variables (IV), Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD), and structural modeling. The core focus is bridging the gap between econometric rigor and policy legibility, ensuring that the causal mechanism is explicit in the main text while maintaining formal defense in the appendix.

This skill guides authors preparing manuscripts for academic journals, specifically addressing the unique 'Panel Review' model (like those at Economic Policy). Instead of standard anonymous refereeing, the paper faces a live debate from two named discussants (Academic and Policy). It teaches authors how to 'war-game' these experts, anticipating their specific objections on rigor and relevance, and planning pre-emptive fixes or precise live rebuttals.

This comprehensive guide teaches authors how to structure a professional rebuttal letter and perform rigorous revisions following referee reports, particularly in econometrics. It details how to address proof gaps, incorporate new evidence, and maintain consistency across the entire manuscript package.