Skill UI

This comprehensive guide outlines the critical steps for authors preparing their accepted ICLR paper for camera-ready submission. It covers de-anonymization procedures, incorporating all fixes promised during the discussion period, completing OpenReview metadata, and assembling all necessary presentation assets, including posters, slide decks, and videos, according to current conference guidelines.

A comprehensive checklist and guide for authors preparing their accepted research papers for final publication (camera-ready). This process involves de-anonymization, restoring full author details, updating copyright and metadata, ensuring formal formatting, and managing the release of promised artifacts and code for reproducibility.

A comprehensive guide for authors on drafting effective, double-blind rebuttals for top-tier academic conferences. Learn how to strategically address reviewer concerns regarding evidence realism, baseline fairness, energy accounting, and deployment honesty, using only existing data without making unsubstantiated promises.

This guide provides a comprehensive framework for drafting authoritative author responses during academic conference reviews (e.g., ISSTA). It covers triage strategies, distinguishing between factual corrections and promised changes, and structuring a Major-Revision ledger. Learn how to address reviewer concerns strategically, maintain anonymity, and anchor all claims to evidence for maximizing acceptance chances.

This comprehensive guide details the complex nine-week process of transforming an accepted academic manuscript into the final, published camera-ready version. It covers critical steps including de-anonymization (restoring acknowledgments and affiliations), executing promised revisions, adherence to publisher formatting rules (ACM/IEEE), preparing artifact links, and structuring the accompanying presentation talk.

This guide teaches the rigorous method of stress-testing academic arguments by anticipating and addressing the strongest potential objections. It provides a structured framework for identifying weak premises, boundary cases, and constructing precise replies (rebuttal, concession, or acceptance of cost). Essential for advanced academic writing, especially in philosophy, to ensure your argument survives expert scrutiny.

This skill guides the architectural organization of complex academic papers, ensuring that the argument unfolds in the clearest possible order within strict word limits. It focuses on the roadmap, the sequence of premises, handling objections, and structuring the introduction and conclusion, rather than sentence-level prose. Use it when your argument is sound but the draft lacks structural clarity or wanders off-topic.

This skill guides users through transforming vague ideas into sharp, defensible, and rigorously structured academic arguments. It emphasizes explicitly stating a deniable thesis, laying out numbered premises, verifying logical validity, and ensuring the soundness of all supporting claims. It is essential for advanced academic writing in fields like philosophy.

This guide details the critical steps for authors preparing their accepted paper for final publication in MLSys proceedings. It covers de-anonymization, restoring company and repository identity, reconciling promised rebuttals, and ensuring metadata accuracy for long-term findability. Essential for managing the complex post-acceptance timeline.

This guide walks authors through the critical steps of transitioning an accepted academic paper from an anonymous submission to the final, published, double-column camera-ready version. It covers de-anonymization (restoring author details, links), fulfilling all review promises, completing ACM metadata and rights, coordinating artifact badges, and planning the in-person conference presentation.

A comprehensive guide for authors preparing accepted academic papers for publication in the ACM Digital Library. This process covers de-anonymization (restoring author details, funding, and public links), applying the strict double-column format, adhering to page budgets, incorporating all results promised during the rebuttal, and finalizing necessary metadata and conference artifacts.

This guide details the critical process of transforming an accepted, anonymous conference paper into its final, published, open-access version for the ACL Anthology. It covers the essential 'three-source merge' process: integrating reviewer-promised revisions, restoring author identity and community acknowledgements, correcting metadata, and managing conference logistics. Essential reading for authors submitting to top-tier NLP venues like NAACL.