Skill UI

This skill provides comprehensive guidance and established patterns for conducting rigorous scientific research and complex data analysis. It helps users structure their thinking process, ensuring a systematic and methodical approach to scholarly inquiry. Ideal for academic projects, literature reviews, and complex data interpretation.

Use the OpenAlex client to query 240M+ scholarly works for literature searches, citation tracking, open access discovery, and bibliometric studies across papers, authors, and institutions.

Literature Review Tool helps researchers gather and synthesize key insights from scholarly texts, highlighting patterns and critical arguments to accelerate literature surveying workflows even when structured content is initially unavailable.

This skill allows users to search, fetch detailed metadata, download, and summarize academic papers from the arXiv repository. It supports searching by keywords or specific arXiv IDs and provides robust arguments for controlling the results count, output directory, and download scope. Ideal for students, researchers, and anyone requiring scholarly literature.

Provides developmental, qualitative, and evidence-traceable review of scholarly works (papers, protocols, ideas). It also rigorously audits low-stakes research assessment rubrics for construct validity, fairness, and governance. Crucially, this tool is strictly forbidden from making high-impact personnel decisions, ranking individuals, or determining final outcomes.

A comprehensive coach designed to guide students and researchers through the entire scholarly writing lifecycle. This skill covers structuring complex academic works—including research papers (IMRaD), theses, dissertations, grant proposals, and conference abstracts. It teaches fundamental writing principles, proper source integration, avoiding plagiarism, and navigating diverse citation styles (APA, MLA, Chicago, GB/T 7714), helping users develop an independent, professional academic voice.

This skill integrates 10 major academic literature APIs (including PubMed, arXiv, OpenAlex, Crossref, etc.). It guides users on converting complex research intents into reproducible, verifiable lookups for papers, preprints, citations, and open-access full texts. It ensures results include verifiable provenance and follows a rigorous workflow for maximum accuracy in scholarly research.

This powerful web toolkit uses Exa to perform advanced web searches and detailed URL content extraction. It is specifically tuned for scientific, technical, and academic research, allowing users to filter results by scholarly categories (e.g., research papers) and include academic domains. Use it for complex lookups, gathering current information, or batch extracting content from articles and PDFs.

This meta-skill is designed to convert complex web research requests into polished, structured, and source-cited deliverables. Use it when you need a market briefing, technical report, or decision memo that requires deep web lookup and scholarly citation. It orchestrates the entire process, including preference inference, multi-source search, drafting, and optional DOCX export, ensuring the output is authoritative and actionable.

This utility reads structured JSON data from multiple search engines (multi-search-engine JSON) provided via standard input. It processes this academic data and converts it into a minimal, standardized BibTeX format, primarily generating @misc{} entries. This feature is ideal for automating the creation of a bibliography or reference list for scholarly papers, enhancing research workflow efficiency.

This skill facilitates structured, bidirectional reading and knowledge synthesis for academic texts, theories, and articles. It forces users to first capture the source material's original intent, before critically mapping its relationships, conflicts, and absorptions against the CrossFrame framework. It ensures structured output with clear source boundaries, making it ideal for deep learning and scholarly work.

This guide details how to position academic manuscripts within a specific geographic scholarly debate, rather than simply citing domain literature. It teaches authors to identify the "closest prior account," articulate a cross-cutting geographic stake, and engage with core geographic theories to enhance the impact of their findings for an advanced scholarly audience.