Skill UI

This guide provides comprehensive rules for authors revising technical papers for top AI/Statistics conferences like AISTATS. It emphasizes achieving statistical rigor, explicitly stating assumptions, pairing every claim with proof or evidence, ensuring conciseness (e.g., adhering to an 8-page limit), and maintaining double-blind academic style. Perfect for PhD students or researchers preparing manuscripts for highly technical review.

This guide provides comprehensive strategies for drafting and revising highly technical academic papers for top-tier conferences like ASPLOS. It focuses on structuring the core argument around cross-layer insights, ensuring claims are quantifiable and bounded, and optimizing the entire manuscript to survive rapid peer review and strict page limitations.

A comprehensive guide for drafting a technical author response (rebuttal) for peer-reviewed academic papers (CAV). It teaches authors how to structure a rebuttal by addressing specific objections related to proof soundness, benchmark fairness, novelty, and scope, using only verifiable evidence, not future promises.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to top-tier security conferences like CCS. It provides rigorous rules on establishing explicit threat models, quantifying security claims with measurable evidence, structuring the core technical argument, and effectively compressing complex research into limited page limits. Essential for academic publication in the field of cybersecurity.

A comprehensive guide detailing how to structure and populate the supplementary material section of technical research papers, especially in NLP and Machine Learning. It distinguishes between load-bearing elements (main text) and audit trails (appendix), covering prompt verbatim, decoding configurations, full result grids, and code anonymization protocols to ensure high reproducibility and academic rigor.

A comprehensive guide for drafting author responses to highly technical peer reviews in top-tier theoretical conferences. Learn how to repair perceived gaps, address objections regarding proof correctness, tightness, and novelty-of-technique, while adhering to specific academic policies and structure.

This guide provides best practices for structuring complex academic manuscripts, particularly for conferences requiring a single-PDF submission model. It details how to optimally split content between the limited body (e.g., 12 pages) and the extensive appendix, ensuring that the crucial theorems, proofs, and auxiliary lemmas are presented in a verifiable and highly readable manner for peer reviewers. Key techniques include implementing restatement discipline and writing roadmap paragraphs for clear verification paths.

A comprehensive guide for drafting and polishing academic manuscripts intended for Current Anthropology (CA) publication. It ensures the article is highly readable by a global, non-specialist audience, minimizes technical jargon, and adheres strictly to CA's house style (Chicago author-date, strict word caps for Major Articles/Reports, and abstract length). Ideal for final revisions, structuring arguments, and achieving maximum scholarly impact.

A comprehensive guide on structuring and writing the 'Related Work' section for elite computer vision conferences like CVPR. It addresses the high velocity of academic literature, teaching advanced methods like defining explicit technical deltas, structuring arguments by research question, maintaining citation hygiene, and handling complex reviewer feedback on originality and concurrency.

A comprehensive guide for authors submitting to top-tier computer vision venues like CVPR. It details how to write highly concise, visually impactful, and rigorous academic papers that pass the 'two-pass reader' test. Focus areas include effective figure design, managing strict page budgets (including figures/tables), calibrating claims to avoid overstatement, and adopting professional technical writing norms.

This tool serves as a comprehensive workflow router for authors submitting manuscripts to The Economic Journal (EJ). It does not write content but guides users through the entire academic publishing lifecycle. By identifying the current bottleneck—whether it's broadening the topic, strengthening causal claims, improving robustness, or polishing the writing style—it accurately directs the user to the next specialized skill needed, ensuring the final work meets the journal's standards of broad relevance and technical rigor.

A comprehensive guide for polishing advanced academic drafts, particularly for top-tier economics journals. It focuses on transforming technical prose into clear, generalist-legible writing by restructuring the argument, leading with economic intuition, and adhering to strict house style conventions. Ideal for the late-stage polish phase when the core research is complete.