Use this after acceptance. EDBT papers are published open access on OpenProceedings.org under a CC-BY-NC-ND license with copyright retained by the authors — this is an open-access production step, not an ACM/IEEE DL upload. Reopen the current host-site camera-ready instructions, the OpenProceedings author guidelines, the decision email, and the registration page before advising.
acmart or IEEEtran.[Template] host/OpenProceedings template, current revision; no manual margin/font edits
[License] CC-BY-NC-ND publishing license completed; copyright retained by authors (NOT an ACM/IEEE transfer)
[Metadata] title, abstract, authors + affiliations/ORCID, keywords all entered and matching PDF
[Volume] ISBN/volume fields as the OpenProceedings volume requires
[References] complete and consistent; DOIs where available (references are unlimited — keep them full)
[Figures] vector where possible; readable in print and on screen; captions self-contained
[Links] every artifact / availability link resolves from a logged-out browser
| Anonymized at submission | Restore at camera-ready | Watch for |
|---|---|---|
| Author block, affiliations, ORCID | Full, correctly ordered | Wrong author order breaks the citation |
| System / prototype name | Real name throughout text, figures, artifact | A leftover placeholder in a caption |
| Acknowledgements, funding | Restored | Grant numbers required by funders |
| Repository / artifact link | Public DOI archive | The old anonymized URL surviving in a footnote |
If the cycle was single-blind, there is nothing to de-anonymize — but still confirm the artifact link is the permanent, public one.
The reviewers required adding a tuned baseline at larger scale and moving an overhead result from the appendix into the body. Camera-ready move: place the overhead result in the scope/discussion with its measurement, add the promised scaling table with variance, restore the real system name in the figures, and point the availability statement at the now-public DOI-archived artifact — without expanding the claim the reviewers accepted.
[Camera-ready status] ready / needs fixes / blocked
[Template + budget] host/OpenProceedings template, per-shape budget met? yes/no
[License] CC-BY-NC-ND completed, copyright retained (not ACM/IEEE)? yes/no
[Metadata] authors/affiliations/ORCID/keywords + ISBN volume fields complete? yes/no
[De-anonymization] (if double-blind) author block / system name / links restored? yes/no
[Reviewer-change map] <required change -> final edit, no scope creep>
[Open science] artifact link is a permanent DOI archive? yes/no
[Remaining owner] <person -> task>