ICDE Submission
Use this for an ICDE research-track submission audit. Reopen the current edition's Call for
Research Papers, Important Dates, and Submission Guidelines before giving deadline-ready
advice; ICDE re-declares its rules on a fresh site each year.
Submission audit
- Confirm the target track. ICDE runs a research track, an industry and applications
track, plus demos/tutorials — route with
icde-topic-selection before formatting.
- Pick the round consciously. Each ICDE edition takes research papers in two rounds
(ICDE 2027: Round 1 paper deadline June 11, 2026; Round 2 November 11, 2026). A paper
rejected in Round 1 is not eligible for Round 2 — it waits for the next edition. Choose
the round you can actually be ready for, not the nearest one.
- Set up Microsoft CMT early: every co-author needs a CMT profile, and conflicts (domain
and individual) are author-declared in CMT. A missing conflict is a review-integrity issue,
not a formatting nit.
- Apply the IEEE double-column template without margin, font, or spacing edits. Long
research papers run to 12 pages plus unlimited references (short papers 6 pages plus
references, per the ICDE 2026 wording — re-confirm for the current edition).
- ICDE is single-blind: author names stay on the paper. Do not anonymize author
identity, self-citations, or the repository — that is a SIGMOD reflex, wrong here.
- Attach supplemental material (code, data, artifacts). Availability is explicitly
considered in the evaluation, so an empty supplement is a scored weakness.
- Check the original-work rule: no prior publication longer than roughly four double-column
pages covering the same work.
Blocking risks
- Submitting to a round the paper cannot be ready for, then being locked out of the same
edition's second round after a Round 1 reject.
- Overlength main text or an altered IEEE template.
- Missing or wrong CMT conflict declarations for any co-author.
- No supplemental material where the call expects availability evidence.
- A systems claim with no operating point, tuned baselines missing, or cost undisclosed.
Desk-reject and triage table
| Trigger |
Severity at ICDE |
Repair window |
| Overlength main text |
Desk reject |
None after the deadline |
| IEEE template tampering |
Desk reject or chair flag |
None |
| Missing CMT conflict for a co-author |
Integrity flag, possible desk reject |
Only before the deadline |
| Empty or unrunnable supplement |
Scored weakness |
Fixable before the deadline |
| Round-1 reject re-sent to Round 2 |
Administrative reject |
None — wait for next edition |
| Unfalsifiable performance claim |
Review-stage damage |
Fixable in the writing/experiments pass |
Final-week sequence for a systems paper
- Freeze the mechanism description and the claims map so every figure has a home in the text.
- Regenerate each figure and table from logged runs so the PDF and supplement cannot diverge.
- Fill the supplement:
run_all.sh, run_small.sh, a README that orients a reviewer in a
minute, and the workload generators with their seeds.
- Verify every co-author's CMT profile exists and all conflicts are filed.
- Confirm the abstract in CMT matches the PDF abstract, and the paper is within 12 pages.
Format anchors
- IEEE two-column layout is tight; wide system diagrams, algorithm blocks, and multi-series
throughput plots that fit a one-column draft routinely overflow — compress early.
- Every number in the pack (page limit, deadlines, blind policy) describes a specific edition;
treat all of them as provisional and re-check the current call.
Output format
[ICDE readiness] Ready / Needs fixes / Not ready
[Round + track] <research/industry, Round 1 or Round 2, with source date>
[Blocking checks] <round-eligibility / page / CMT-conflicts / supplement / IEEE-format>
[Evidence risk] <one systems-evaluation issue>
[Desk-reject risk] <one issue>
[Fix order] <ordered fixes before the round deadline>
