技能 职场通用 城市经济学期刊投稿预检清单

城市经济学期刊投稿预检清单

v20260724
jue-submission
本指南是投稿至《城市经济学期刊》(JUE)的全面预检清单。它详细指导作者检查稿件格式、标准误差报告、附件要求、投稿费用支付,以及关键的申明(如保密数据豁免)。用于提交前进行全面检查,确保投稿符合期刊要求,提高录用几率。
获取技能
113 次下载
概览

Submission Preflight (jue-submission)

When to trigger

  • "Submitting tomorrow" — last check before pressing submit on Editorial Manager
  • Unsure which files, fees, and declarations the Elsevier submission expects
  • Confirming format and the cover letter are JUE-compliant
  • Deciding between a full JUE article and the JUE: Insights short-paper track
  • The data is confidential and the exemption must be requested at submission

Process facts (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准)

  • JUE is the Elsevier field flagship in urban economics (ISSN 0094-1190; bimonthly; founded 1974 by Edwin Mills). Submission is through Elsevier Editorial Manager.
  • Review model: single-anonymized (single-blind) — reviewers are anonymous to authors; author identities are visible. Editors first assess suitability; suitable papers go to (typically ≥2) reviewers.
  • Submission fee: a nonrefundable US$100 fee is charged on new submissions, paid during submission; the paper is considered only after payment (待核实 exact amount and any waivers live).
  • Co-editors-in-chief: Nathaniel Baum-Snow (Toronto) and Kristian Behrens (UQÀM) (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准).
  • Mandatory replication policy: data + code deposited to a major repository at acceptance, before publication; proprietary/confidential data requires an exemption requested in the submission cover letter (see jue-replication-package).
  • JUE: Insights short-paper track: ≤6,000 words and ≤5 exhibits; each exhibit below five buys +200 words (a zero-exhibit paper ≤7,000 words); manuscripts must carry the "JUE: Insights" title prefix; same peer-review process (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准).

Preflight checklist

Format & style

  • Manuscript follows Elsevier/JUE format; exhibits and notes self-contained; references complete
  • Abstract present (re-check exact word limit live; references in abstract given in full) (待核实)
  • Standard errors reported; follow the journal's significance-reporting convention (待核实 exact style)
  • Maps/figures legible in grayscale; spatial units, scale, and CRS clear in exhibits
  • If JUE: Insights — title carries the "JUE: Insights" prefix; ≤6,000 words / ≤5 exhibits respected

Files & fees on Editorial Manager

  • Main manuscript uploaded; exhibits and any online appendix in the expected formats
  • US$100 submission fee ready (nonrefundable; paper considered only after payment)
  • Cover letter prepared: contribution, venue fit (why JUE not RSUE/JEG/JPubE), and any confidential-data exemption request
  • Suggested/excluded reviewers per the form, if requested
  • Replication folder prepared (deposit due at acceptance, but assembled now — see jue-replication-package)

Declarations

  • Competing-interests / funding declaration per Elsevier policy
  • Confirmed not under review elsewhere; authorship and contributions accurate
  • Data-availability statement consistent with the replication plan (or the exemption)
  • Cover letter answers "is this JUE?" and "is the design credible?" up front
  • A single best exhibit (map + design figure) makes the result legible at a glance

Anti-patterns

  • Submitting without the US$100 fee ready (the paper is not considered until it is paid)
  • Treating the APC (open-access charge) as if it were the submission fee — they are different
  • Forgetting the "JUE: Insights" title prefix on a short-paper submission, or exceeding its limits
  • Confidential data with no exemption request in the cover letter
  • Naive (non-spatial) standard errors left in the tables at submission
  • A cover letter that does not pre-empt the "why not a sibling journal" question

What to expect after submitting

  • Editor triage first. The co-EiCs (or a handling editor) assess suitability before any referee sees the paper; a poorly-fit or weakly-identified spatial paper is desk-rejected here. This is why the cover letter must pre-empt the "why JUE" and the obvious sorting/SUTVA objections.
  • Then typically ≥2 referees under single-anonymized review. Expect the design referee and the urban-economics referee personas (see jue-referee-strategy).
  • Outcomes are the usual reject / major or minor revision / accept; a major revision at a field flagship is a real opportunity, not a soft reject — route the decision to jue-rebuttal.
  • Open-access option. If accepted, an APC applies only if you choose open access; this is separate from the submission fee and is not a condition of acceptance (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准).

Last-mile traps specific to JUE

  • The submission fee is nonrefundable even on desk-reject — make sure the paper is genuinely JUE-fit before paying.
  • Spatial standard errors and a map of the identifying variation are the two things a JUE editor scans first; do not submit without them.
  • The replication folder need not be deposited at submission, but the data-availability statement and any confidential-data exemption must be in the cover letter now.

Output format

【Format】Elsevier/JUE format; SEs reported; grayscale-legible exhibits? [Y/N]
【Track】full article / JUE: Insights (prefix + ≤6,000w/≤5 exhibits)?
【Fee】US$100 nonrefundable ready? [Y/N]
【Cover letter】contribution + venue fit + confidential-data exemption (if any)? [Y/N]
【Replication】folder assembled (deposit at acceptance)? [Y/N]
【Declarations】competing interests / funding / data-availability? [Y/N]
【Next step】submit via Editorial Manager → jue-rebuttal when the decision arrives

Cover letter: the one document that does framing work

For a JUE submission the cover letter is not a formality — it is where you do the framing the manuscript format cannot. In a few tight paragraphs: state the spatial question and the headline magnitude; name the strand and why this is a JUE contribution rather than an RSUE/JEG/JPubE one; flag the identifying variation and that the obvious spatial confounds (sorting, SUTVA, spatial SEs) are addressed; and, if the data is proprietary or confidential, make the replication-policy exemption request here with the access path. Suggested/excluded reviewers, if requested, go in the form. A cover letter that pre-empts the editor's first two questions — "is this JUE?" and "is the design credible?" — materially lowers desk-reject risk.

Supplementary resources

信息
Category 职场通用
Name jue-submission
版本 v20260724
大小 4.47KB
更新时间 2026-07-28
语言