Skill UI

This comprehensive guide provides a structured strategy for handling major scientific manuscript revisions and writing professional rebuttal letters. It instructs authors on how to systematically address every reviewer concern—especially regarding mechanism, scale, uncertainty, and reproducibility—while ensuring the revised manuscript remains perfectly synchronized with the archived data and code.

A comprehensive guide for academics on structuring and articulating the core, novel contribution of a scholarly paper, particularly in specialized fields like Game Theory and Economic Behavior. It provides a framework for crafting a single, highly impactful 'contribution sentence' and organizing the claim cascade (Headline, Why Open, Key Idea), ensuring the theoretical advance is immediately legible to specialized editors and reviewers.

A comprehensive guide for authors addressing major revisions (R&R) for high-level journals, particularly in game theory and economics. It details strategies for structuring responses to referees and editors, covering theory corrections, establishing novelty, presenting robust experimental evidence, and improving overall exposition. Use this to ensure your rebuttal is precise, authoritative, and maximizes acceptance chances.

This guide details the unique and transparent submission process for Games and Economic Behavior (GEB). It clearly explains the roles of the publicly known Editor-in-Charge, anonymous Advisory Editors, and referees, describing the 'single-anonymized' review model. It helps authors set realistic expectations regarding the high standards, low acceptance odds (~15% published), and critical points for improving their manuscripts before submission.

A comprehensive pre-submission guide for authors targeting high-caliber academic journals like Games and Economic Behavior (GEB). It ensures compliance with critical publishing standards, covering abstract length limits (≤250 words), mandatory conference-version disclosures, generative AI declarations, and correct formatting (LaTeX/Word elsarticle). Use this checklist before submitting to Editorial Manager to minimize rejection risks.

This skill guides the polishing of prose, abstract, and introduction for manuscripts intended for Games and Economic Behavior (GEB). It enforces a rigorous, idea-first writing style, ensuring the work is highly readable for a broad, multi-disciplinary academic audience (including economics, CS, and biology). Key guidelines include maintaining an abstract under 250 words, structuring the introduction around the core question and result, and motivating formal arguments with clear prose.

This skill guides authors on how to position interdisciplinary manuscripts for journals covering global environmental change (GEC). It emphasizes connecting multiple knowledge domains (e.g., biophysical science, governance, social science) and reframing the research gap as a conceptual contribution, rather than merely pointing out an absence of study. Essential for drafting strong introductions and satisfying reviewer requirements for disciplinary breadth.

This guide helps researchers translate academic findings into rigorous, evidence-grounded implications for policy, governance, and practice concerning global environmental change. It stresses that implications must be specific (naming actors and levers), honest about scope and uncertainty, and directly traceable to the study's results, avoiding generic overstatements.

This guide details the rigorous evaluation process used by Global Environmental Change (GEC) for manuscripts, including double-anonymized review, initial editorial screening for scope and social-science fit, and the role of interdisciplinary external reviewers. It provides critical insights into common rejection pitfalls and actionable advice on how to structure a paper to maximize its chances of acceptance in academic publishing.

A structured guide for authors responding to major or minor revisions in academic journals. It teaches strategies for managing interdisciplinary reviewer feedback, reconciling conflicting points, protecting the core scientific contribution, and maintaining a professional, persuasive tone when writing the rebuttal letter to the editor.

This guide ensures that manuscripts for Global Environmental Change (GEC) are rigorous and highly readable for an interdisciplinary, policy-relevant audience. It focuses on polishing prose, front-loading contributions, minimizing jargon, and structuring discussions to meet strict word and abstract caps, ensuring clarity across environmental science, governance, and policy domains.

This comprehensive skill assists authors in determining if their Earth or space science manuscript is suitable for Geophysical Research Letters (GRL). It provides detailed guidelines covering journal positioning, required scope (atmosphere, ocean, solid earth, etc.), the method and evidence bar, strict house style rules (brevity, structure, figures), and a final pre-submission checklist. It is designed to help authors re-frame and maximize the impact of single, highly significant findings.